260
submitted 11 months ago by ironsoap@lemmy.one to c/news@lemmy.world

Bill Gates name-checked Elon Musk and Steve Jobs during a fireside chat on Thursday. The Microsoft founder said he considers himself "very nice" compared to his fellow tech leaders. But Gates acknowledged that a certain level of intensity is required in innovative fields. Bill Gates said he considers himself a more relaxed boss than many of his tech compatriots at the top.

The Microsoft founder name-checked Elon Musk and Steve Jobs during a fireside chat on Thursday after being awarded the Peter G. Peterson Leadership Excellence Award by the Economic Club of New York.

The talk's moderator asked Gates about the lessons he learned in creating a culture of innovation during his time at the helm of Microsoft.

The billionaire, who co-founded the technology company with his childhood friend Paul Allen in 1975, said leaders like himself have to think about how "hardcore" they should be when spearheading innovative companies.

"Everybody is different. Elon pushes hard, maybe too much," Gates said, referencing Musk. "Steve Jobs pushed hard, maybe too much."

"I think of myself as very nice compared to those guys," he added with a laugh.

Jobs co-founded Apple in 1976 with Steve Wozniak, while Musk is the founder and SpaceX and the Boring Company, and cofounder of OpenAI and Neuralink.

Gates has a checkered history with both men. He and Jobs nursed a decades-long love-hate relationship, going from allies to rivals and back again several times. Their back-and-forth competitive spirit is often credited with spurring major innovations at both Microsoft and Apple over the years.

Steve Jobs Bill Gates Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Beck Diefenbach/Reuters; Mike Cohen/Getty Images for The New York Times

After Jobs died in 2011, Gates said he respected the Apple founder and was grateful for their competition.

The philanthropist's relationship with Musk has been even more turbulent in recent years. The two men have publicly poked at each other and frequently disagree on everything from space travel to climate change.

Gates told Musk's biographer, Walter Isaacson, that the Tesla CEO was "super mean" to him in 2022.

"Once he heard I'd shorted the stock, he was super mean to me, but he's super mean to so many people, so you can't take it too personally," Gates told Isaacson.

But Gates acknowledged during the Thursday discussion that a "certain intensity" is required to succeed as an innovative leader.

"In my 20s, I was monomaniacally focused on Microsoft," he said. "I didn't believe in weekends or vacations.'

The moderator asked Gates to confirm an urban legend that has circulated in recent years in which the billionaire memorized all of his employees' license plates during the early days of Microsoft so he could track who was putting in long hours at work.

"It wasn't that many license plates. We only had a few hundred employees," Gates said, seemingly confirming the tale.

"I can still tell you when they came in and out," he added.

Gates cites his intensity with the "positive experience" he had at Microsoft, which he said still guides his thinking today.

"I view every problem through this innovation lens," he said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 92 points 11 months ago

Now yes, he is. Bill was a fucking asshole and a total sociopath not too long ago.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago

still is, in fact. the philanthropy is basically morality banking- and it's peanuts to what he could be doing.

also, it's a great way to dodge taxes and still be able to buy shit.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

That's . . . that's not how charitable donation writeoffs work.

Really, this whole comment is a terminally-online trainwreck.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That’s not the tax dodge.

The foundation is its own 501c non profit, they donate to it, put their money into the trust fund.

The trust fund then turns and invests all that cash thst they donated and make bank while paying back “costs” for whatever. The only tax that gets paid is personal income taxes on the salaries paid out.

Which are much reduced because the fund also pays for things like hotels and rentals and travel

What the foundation then gives out, they were going to give out anyhow so as to whitewash their reputation and make themselves feel good

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jonne@infosec.pub 28 points 11 months ago

It's exactly how it works. You calculate what your tax bill will be, and instead of paying it in taxes where the government decides what to do with the money (in theory democratically, in practice it's different obviously, see point #6), it goes into a charity in your name.

Then you use this charity for multiple things:

  • Free PR, as you don't need to use your own money, you use the money that otherwise went to taxes. The headline is X donates $N billion to charity, you look so giving, even though it's money you wouldn't have been able to keep any other way.
  • Your foundation donates to prestigious academic institutions. That's something that you can parlay into a board seat or at least influence. Now you can decide what this institution will do. In Bill Gates' case, he used his influence to make sure the Oxford vaccine wasn't open sourced, but instead licensed. This delayed the response in the developing world by a year or so, and made sure that the pharmaceutical industry made even more money than they even made otherwise. Oh, and Bill Gates privately (on the non-charity side), owns a bunch of pharma stock.
  • speaking of academic institutions: you buy a fancy building for their economics department. Suddenly the whole field of economics is basically limited to professors teaching trickle down economics. Marx' analysis of economics is considered fringe, and MMT as well.
  • your foundation throws ~~parties~~ fundraisers where you get to hang out with important people. Catering, venue, entertainment, etc is paid for by your charity. The people donating to your charity are using their own charities to do so, it's just one big circlejerk with free money that would've gone to taxes instead.
  • you get to circumcise a bunch of African men for dubious reasons and people will think you're awesome
  • your foundation can donate to politicians or political organisations that will advocate for things you want. The things you want are deregulation, less taxes, etc. This in turn benefits you personally again on the non-charity side.
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] netchami@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago

Ne he's not. He uses his foundation to avoid taxes and even gets praised for it. This video provides a pretty good explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OH4uh8cHuto

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 87 points 11 months ago

When you've spent literally decades trying to bury your past self with philanthropic acts and good PR, it becomes quite easy for people to think you're at least nicer than the steaming turd in a dumpster fire that is Elon Musk.

Gates may be nice compared to some of his billionaire compatriots, but understand that's a very low bar to pass.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 83 points 11 months ago

Being better than Elon is a pretty low bar but, I suppose I'd agree he passed it

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

It's like saying "I may be shit, but I'm not burning, sulfurous, liquid fire shits." Dude is still shit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 63 points 11 months ago

Well Elon Musk is basically a cartoon villain at this point so that's not saying much

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 17 points 11 months ago

Yeah exactly. Sure, Gates clears the bar, but it was a very low bar.

[-] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

His mum already looks like one.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 61 points 11 months ago

Bill Gate's PR is so good. Uses his foundation to dodge tax, prevents vaccines patents from being opened up for anybody to use, and people love him for it.

He's a piece of shit just like Musk, Bezos, and Jobs.

I 100% guarantee the likes of Bezos and Zuckerberg will try to emulate Bill's philanthropist PR strategy when they get old.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 11 months ago

Gates: "I'm at least 1% less evil than these two sociopaths."

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] netchami@sh.itjust.works 37 points 11 months ago

Bill Gates and all of his billionaire friends can go fuck themselves. Billionaire philanthropy is the biggest lie of this century, this is a great video about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OH4uh8cHuto

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

I'm sure you're right in some ways, but when your source is "Some guy's YT channel", nobody will take you seriously, except for other people that believe everything they see on YT

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

If you put the general noncery and the Linux circlejerking aside, and just take it at face value, it's still absolutely not true.

Back in the day, Bill Gates was infamous for being a jerk during reviews of services. I remember Joel Spolsky calling out the infamous BillG Reviews in a post of his, and there were several instances where others had said they'd been verbally insulted or just fired for getting something wrong. There are probably still plenty of stories around online of Gates losing it with entire rooms of people, cancelling 3+ year projects he didn't personally like, or making unreasonable demands because he was in a bad mood.

Don't get me wrong, Jobs and Musk are cunts too, but Gates wasn't any better.

[-] Meltrax@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

It's quite literally not possible to be a nice guy and region billions of dollars in net worth. Social systems don't actually support that. I'm not talking about inheritance or marrying into it - if you are the fortunate maker, and the fortune is that big, you have to step on a lot of people to get there and more to stay there. Just depends how well you hide it.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Gates would insult employees but Jobs was legendary for screaming at his employees. But the worst is the stories that Woz tells about how bad Jobs was. Things like not giving stock to the very early Apple employees. He abandoned his daughter such that the mother and daughter were on welfare when he was worth millions.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 36 points 11 months ago

Nah, he's just used more of his money to whitewash his image with articles such as this. When you peek behind the curtain, he's just as ruthless as the others.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 36 points 11 months ago

Bill did some horrible shit in the past, especially during the start of Microsoft.

But these days he is trying to improve, which we should commend. He could just stayed an awful billionaire that used his money for evil instead of trying to eradicate smallpox.

[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 34 points 11 months ago

His medical work is not commendable. Right now it’s almost impossible to do anything on the world stage without the foundation’s approval. This recent article has links to some issues. This older article highlights a bunch of problems that were highlighted during the ‘Rona vaccine process. Either you do what the foundation wants or you don’t do medicine. Even when you do what the foundation wants, you move capital and ownership up to the top (Gates was a huge proponent of the COVID vaccine IP). The foundation has done good things. The opportunity cost of the foundation is staggering.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 34 points 11 months ago

Steve Jobs is the best of all three of them. At least he had the decency to die.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

In his book, "Idea Man: A Memoir by the Cofounder of Microsoft," Allen writes that in 1982, he overheard Ballmer and Bill Gates discussing a plan to reduce Allen's 36 percent stake in Microsoft shortly after Allen was diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Gates is a bad person. And I have no care about his hot take on himself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 30 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Bill just has a better publicist.

Correction: he HAS a publicist. Elon doesn't.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

No one is the villain of their own story.

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 25 points 11 months ago

while hes not the greatest person, hes at least trying to be philanthropic and not just cartoony evil

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

He sort of is now. He sure wasn’t out to help society in the 80s and 90s.

[-] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

Steve Jobs was also philanthropic, he just chose not to be vocal about it.

Bill doesn't come off as kind, rather amicable more than anything else. He knows how to shmooze. And constantly complaining about petty things, and still comparing himself to Jobs, in the news means he still can't let go of the past.

But I agree with you. As long as he's giving his money away for causes that benefit the public, I couldn't care less what kind of person he is.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] MudMan@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

We are grading.

On a hell of a curve.

"I'm not so bad, as serial killers go" is not a great defense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

If Bill Gates was a good person he would already have given away his billions like Chuck Feeney rather than just talk about giving away the money.

You’re not fooling anyone Bill.

You’ll be eaten along with all the other billionaires, including ‘ole Musky.

[-] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

Unlike them, he is at least working on giving his money away. And he has said in the past that the government should tax people like him more. There is a difference, even though I agree he shouldn't be a billionaire, either.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Rusticus@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 14 points 11 months ago

Nice by oligarch standards. So maybe he's a slightly less huge asshole. But only because he mellowed with age. In his heyday he was every bit a robber baron, just like the others.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 22 points 11 months ago

Space Karen is a large steaming pile of shit, and while I agree with Bill that currently he is a smaller steaming pile of shit than Space Karen, that is a low bar to pass.

[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 11 months ago

Compared to hitler I'm also a pretty nice guy

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Dra@lemmy.zip 19 points 11 months ago

Bill Gates is a master of corporate blunt force, but also knows the absolute power of having PR make you appear friendly, harmless and mandane.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago

Jobs basically offed himself so it's difficult to compare to him. Elon Musk is one of the biggest pieces of shits there is so I'm not sure that says much by comparing to him.

While I would not say Bill is a terrible person, he has done some very problematic shit in the past.

[-] NewPerspective@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

The only difference is I bet Bill Gates will taste better. Elon is obviously too stressed out and that ruins the meat.

[-] Kitten_Mittens@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Can Elon or Steve leap over an office chair from a standing position in one jump? Yeah, I didn’t fucking think so.
#80sGates4lyfe

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] s_s@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago

Musk is not a tech leader, lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

Okay, with Musk, the bar feels extremely low to clear on being a better person, especially after telling advertisers who chose of their own free will to leave twitter/x to go fuck themselves.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ill give him that he seems nice. But nice isn't about substance, nice is the wrapping paper. To say one is a good person on substance is to call them kind, different than nice. Same way people will tell you a lot of Southerners can be very very nice, but very unkind at the same time.

He's also comparing himself against some of the lowest bars for this metric so that's also saying a lot on the claim as a whole.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
260 points (89.6% liked)

News

23406 readers
2279 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS