288

Release notes of an open source app. Someone is pretty mad at Canonical for Snap (programming.dev)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by suy@programming.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] DiabloD3@programming.dev 117 points 11 months ago

Good on them. Snap is a plague.

[-] pkill@programming.dev 35 points 11 months ago

Why are they even still pushing that nonsense when flatpak at least somewhat gets closer to getting bwrap implemented right?

[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 41 points 11 months ago

Why are they even still pushing that nonsense

It's a for-profit corporation. They only have one goal.

[-] hunger@programming.dev 27 points 11 months ago

To be fair: snaps can work for all kinds of things all over the stack from the kernel to individual applications, while flatpak just does applications. Canonical is building a lot around those abilities to handle lower level things, so I guess it makes sense for them.

IMHO flatpak does the applications better and more reliably and those are what I personally care for, so I personally stay away from snaps.

[-] pkill@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

Fair point. For instance one thing that sucks about flatpaks is that you can't torsocks them

[-] tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social 57 points 11 months ago

What is AFTL? Probably not "Anterior talofibular ligament" as the internet told me

[-] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 74 points 11 months ago

Android File Transfer for Linux. Here's the release note from the OP.

[-] suy@programming.dev 27 points 11 months ago

Thanks. I should have linked to that myself, perhaps.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago

What's easier to understand: ankle anatomy or Ubuntu publishing.

[-] Teon@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Ankle!

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 49 points 11 months ago

Canonical could have done a lot better with the explanation message here. The idea is to push apps towards XDG compliance and the use of things like Portals.

That said, unlike Wayland, portals really aren't there yet from a UX perspective, especially for an app that is heavy on file transfers.I prefer what Flathub does where it puts a nice green checker beside your app for XDG compliance - it's an encouragement, but not an enforcement.

[-] anzo@programming.dev 39 points 11 months ago

This post title is misleading. The developer was working with Snap until Canonical didn't allowed it anymore. He's pissed with the policy enforcement which is strictly speaking commercial and as bad as Apple's afaik...

[-] suy@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago

Sorry, could you clarify what you mean? I don't see the difference. Isn't the author complaining about Canonical for the policy enforcement?

[-] anzo@programming.dev 8 points 11 months ago

Canonical has been taking bad decisions for quite some time now, and this developer was trying to reach Ubuntu users even while probably knowing these. Which makes sense, of course. The point being that this dev's disappointment seems quite specific in these notes (against Snap), and imho he might work again towards shipping their app through Snap if he was allowed to. My comment compares Canonical to Apple, to give some context of where Canonical is at so many other idiosyncrasies (for example, I also heard other bad stuff about their H.R., in particular a way too lengthy hiring process.)