From Athens, the ECB will announce the digital euro – How it will work (hellas.postsen.com)

submitted 1 year ago by sv1sjp@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] honey_im_meat_grinding@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This means that the role of commercial banks is not canceled with the launch of the single digital currency, but they will still be an important part of the ecosystem.

[...] a ceiling on the liquidity that citizens will be able to maintain in digital euro, in the order of 2,000 or 3,000 euros per user. The goal is for the digital euro to be used purely as a means of exchange and not as a means of accumulating wealth.

The benefits of the digital euro include the immediacy and security of transactions – [...] instant payments [...] made in a few seconds

A very important advantage of the digital euro is also the zero cost of its use, putting an end to the – harsh in some cases – commissions that banks currently impose on direct payments

Maybe I'm talking from a privileged country, but none of this would benefit me at all in my country as the banking system already does all of this. It's a bit disappointing that they seem to be intentionally kneecapping the digital euro so that they can placate private banks. Although I wouldn't mind what they're doing if they also provided a government run bank that didn't shoo away customers if they didn't have the right risk profile, that competed with private banks (e.g. Norway's state-run consumer bank exists alongside private ones). For example, legal sex workers are often pushed out by private banks.

[-] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

If it's reasonably private and a third-party morality police isn't deciding what you should be allowed to spend your money on, it'd be a big improvement over the US system.

[-] Nighed@sffa.community 4 points 1 year ago

It will be interesting to see how it works Vs normal card transactions etc. Will it be mandatory to accept? Will it end up going through Visa/Mastercard anyway, or will it create a competitor?

[-] ZeroFox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a EU centralized version of venmo

[-] Virkkunen@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Brazil has a thing called PIX. Universal (bank to bank), instant, 24/7, free of charge (except for business, but the fees are way lower than credit card transaction fees). It doesn't use blockhain, crypto or none of that, and it simply works. I think every bank and financial institution is required to provide PIX to their customers, and you can easily send money to anyone using a registered phone number, email, CPF (social security number (and no, we aren't as paranoid as americans about it)) or a randomly generated key.

PIX entered beta testing in late 2020, and soon enough was widely available in the country, to absolute approval. It's so easy to open bank accounts and have a PIX key that even homeless people with access to internet (which is also easy to get) have PIX and ask for money through it. Physical money is fading fast and people are loving it in Brazil.

[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most EU countries also have their own version of PIX, like the Netherlands has iDeal. The EU digital coin is something else. It’s basically digital cash. You load up your digital wallet with money from your bank account and then you can pay in stores or transfer coins to another person’s wallet without having banks act as an intermediary.

[+] rastilin@kbin.social -13 points 1 year ago

I can't believe they won't just use Bitcoin. If the EU weighs in then Bitcoin would probably get much more stable through sheer inertia. "But then they won't be able to control it" I hear you say. Good, Bitcoin not being able to be diluted by any one government to try and tamper with the economy is one of its upsides. Slower economic growth is a perfectly fine tradeoff for not having 10% inflation year over year like we have the last few years and economists are basically the modern version of oracular priests reading the stars and just as reliable.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

According to studies published in Joule and American Chemical Society in 2019, bitcoin's annual energy consumption results in annual carbon emission ranging from 17 to 22.9 MtCO 2 which is comparable to the level of emissions of countries as Jordan and Sri Lanka.

Fuck Bitcoin.

[-] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

The population would never accept Bitcoin. Learn from it, and adapt what we have now to work with the technologies of the future.

[-] Nighed@sffa.community 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't cryptocurrencies have problems with ledger size and processing speed at this size.

And don't the processing nodes require some sort of tip to process transactions?

Using crypto would probably result in slower, more complicated payments, while confusing many less techy people. (Who would just end up using some kind of exchange - at which point you could just use this or a bank )

load more comments

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023

80 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39005 readers

1006 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.