122
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JoMomma@lemm.ee 104 points 2 years ago
[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 39 points 2 years ago
[-] JoMomma@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago
[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Also worth considering that growing up with cats linked to higher-income households, which is linked better access to Healthcare and accurate mental health diagnoses

[-] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Do you have a reference? The only reference I could find (which I’m not thrilled with) indicates that their survey says exactly the opposite. Dogs skew towards higher income households, cats skew lower.

Dogs have a higher cost of ownership in food and vet bills, but I suspect (owning both for many years) dogs have a much higher cost in time invested. If I was working two jobs to make ends meet, I could see doing it with a cat, but not a dog.

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I thought it’s compared to not having a cat, not compared to having a dog.

The headline wasn’t “those who grew up with cats more likely than those who grew up with dogs…”

[-] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I think that’s a reasonable question, regardless of the intended original meaning. I honestly think it’d make a good (and fundable) study.

Basically, look at the income skew in the disease population controlling for pet ownership. If high income cat owners are more likely positive, then we’re likely looking at a medical access question and the overall national health impact estimate should be adjusted accordingly.

[-] dsdme@lemm.ee 54 points 2 years ago

A dog clearly wrote this.

[-] Dio@lemy.lol 44 points 2 years ago

The fuck is with all this anti cat propaganda nonsense.

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 40 points 2 years ago

Astroturfing from Big Dog.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 8 points 2 years ago

Clifford knows his demographics.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Conservatives?

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 31 points 2 years ago

It’s because they stare at the wall and ceiling at things that aren’t there and such, making you question your sanity.

It’s fine.

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I feel like the title implies that cats cause schizophrenia when what's more likely is that people who have schizophrenia are more likely to like and own cats, and schizophrenia tends to run in families.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Or (EDIT: people with cats are) more likely to seek treatment.

[-] theredknight@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Cats can carry toxoplasmosis which seems to have a correlation to schizophrenia. This could be the cause of crazy cat lady syndrome: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29068607/

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Despite what a lot of people think, most pet cats don't have toxoplasmosis, and even those with toxoplasmosis rarely actually pass it on to humans, so that really shouldn't occur often enough to be measurable if it was transmission from cats causing it. You're more likely to get toxoplasmosis from uncooked meat, since that's how most humans are infected.

Now, people with toxoplasmosis are more likely to own cats, so there could be a correlation there, but at the same time, diagnosis for schizophrenia is more common in countries where there are less people infected with toxoplasmosis overall (I think in the US only like 11% of the population has been infected before). I can't say I feel like that would sufficiently explain the correlation.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

don't care don't care
i like cats

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

K can folks like just post stuff so we don't need to "read the article" aha.

Toxoplasmosis

Isn't that limited to outdoor cats usually? If cats don't start out with toxo how do they actually "get" it?

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

The article talks about it in some detail. Cats are apparently part of the parasite’s multi-organism life cycle. It does start in rodents, wherein it manipulates their brains to make them less fearful of cats, making them more likely to come into contact with them. So, I guess indoor cats would be less likely to contract the parasite, but I’m not sure if that’s the only vector.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Ya like Ive never had a mouse and its def not on their account aha. Thats a pretty big contingency

[-] mx_smith@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah this article is complete bullshit. We have known about Toxiiplasmasios for a long time and know that it’s from rodents that carry the parasite. If your cat is indoors then the chance of it catching a mouse with this parasite is super slim, and then for the human to catch it is even slimmer. Complete FUD.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

That's kinda what I was thinking. If I'm totally candid, it seems like there was some unsaid kind of implication that rich people have larger houses maybe where theres more rodents to worry about or something...?

Like, they didn't seem to come out and say that directly but I feel like its sort of inescapable lol

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

You are more likely to get toxoplasmosis from eating undercooked meat than from your indoor cat unless you have a bad rodent problem in your house.

[-] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 15 points 2 years ago

You can take my cat away......out of my cold, dead hands.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Warm, dead legs 🐈‍⬛

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
122 points (86.3% liked)

News

36429 readers
648 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS