133
submitted 10 months ago by TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to c/movies@lemmy.world

10 years after Zod's snapped neck, Martha, "some kinda Suicide Squad", CGI moustache, rennouncing your wish, the hiearchy of power changing, and Speed Force PS1 graphics, the DC Extended Universe finally comes to a close. And it ends the same way it started - with a Rotten score.

Looking back at all this wasted potential, what would you have done differently with the DCEU, and what are your hopes for James Gunn's DC Universe?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sheridan@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago

I wasn’t even aware a new Aquaman movie was being released.

[-] kratoz29@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

This is how bad the situation is.

Hopefully it is decent, I liked the first one.

[-] frickineh@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

If the trailer is any indication (and I know it isn't always), it's bad and the cast is really phoning it in. Jason Momoa has never been a great actor but every word he says sounds like he's reading it from notes he wrote on his hand. Nicole Kidman is like, "things are bad" with the same tone of voice I say, "we're out of milk." Just really terrible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago

what are your hopes for James Gunn’s DC Universe?

  1. Harley needs to be louder, angrier, and have access to a time machine.
  2. Whenever Harley is not on screen, all the other characters should be asking, "Where's Harley?"
[-] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

Personally, I think the DCU should be a realistic, down-to-earth setting...that's completely off the wall and swarming with magic robots.

And also we should win stuff by watching.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 10 months ago

Something something science-based with dragons something something.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Like dinner with Margo Robbie.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sheeple@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

This is the case for when franchises get milked forever. They CAN'T die on a good note. Good notes is what promotes sequels. Only when they get a low note they start discontinueing.

It's why most franchise stories seem to end on dissatisfactory cliffhangers

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sometimes it's not even "forever". Wonder Woman '84 was only the 2nd film and it shit the bed so hard it not only killed any future WW movie, but it tanked the Star Wars movie the director was supposed to do next.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 10 months ago

Exactly.

This is why I support the MCU going out on a limb with their new stuff. They're already on a dang limb, so own it. This will happen to them someday, too, and they know it! So when an opportunity comes up to risk everything to go out gloriously and respectably, you take it. If/When they're lucky, they'll find something new and squeeze a few more years out of it.

DC never did that without backsliding on it.

It's decreasing returns. I mean I know we've had disney princesses around for nearly a century, but you gotta take basic economics into account in this stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Looking back at all this wasted potential, what would you have done differently with the DCEU,

  1. Don't try to cash money imitate MCU
  2. Don't try to compete in a saturated market with a similar product
  3. Hire actual screenwriters to plan continuity and style

and what are your hopes for James Gunn's DC Universe?

Don't try and just go back to animation since DC still dominates in that format.

Pay morbillions to make Batman Arkham Alsume remastered remastered version

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

#1 thing I would have done would have been putting Bruce Timm and Paul Dini in charge and left them alone.

"Yeah, just like the animated stuff, but live action. GO!"

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Did you watch Batman and Harley Quinn? No thanks. As much as I love Batman TAS, Bruce Timm should not be let near new Batman stuff.

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

it would have been better if they didn't spend most of the movie just showing us their fetishes

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I did not, but in terms of the way they built out the animated universe was superlative.

[-] aaaa@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

That showed us that the Animated Series was so good because the network restrictions forced him and his team to be creative. When given full control, we get... Well, this and the Killing Joke

[-] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 19 points 10 months ago

When the review embargo was set for 15 hours after it opened in the UK, I knew the reviews weren't going to be favourable.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago

Hopes? None. Warner Bros. has no fucking clue how to use DC characters and ideas in theaters. They may get lucky with specific movies being decent, but the best movies are not even as good as the worst of the animated movies and series. They keep throwing money and names at live action, instead of focusing on telling good stories that stay true to the essence of the characters.

I don't see Gunn doing any better tbh. For one, he's going to be hamstrung by whatever Warner decides is the goal. For another, he's going to end up limited by whatever flawed view executives have of the servers characters. And then he still may not have a grasp of what either comics fans or non comic fans need from a movie featuring DC characters.

[-] Hereforpron2@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 10 months ago

I think that another risk you run by putting Gunn in this role after he found the only success in modern DC movies and series is pressure to become too Gunn-y. The same way that Marvel was so taken with Taika Waititi's Ragnarok that they had him go even more Waititi on Love and Thunder, which clearly made it worse, and then tried to incorporate similar humor in other projects that fell flat. Sometimes playing to hard into a unique success just proves that it was either largely novelty-driven or that you just can't recapture it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

For one, he's going to be hamstrung by whatever Warner decides is the goal.

Gunn confirmed that DC Studios is completely seperate from Warner Bros., they will just be distributing the films.

The movies don't all have to be connected by a single overreaching narrative, give us some standalones. Give us a feel good Justice Society movie and a utopian sci-fi Legion of Superheroes. It would also be nice to move away from the core Justice League team and world or universe level threats. Let Nightwing stop the Zodiac Master's plan to rob a series of banks.

[-] FatTony@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You moron, they tried that with 'The Batman' and look how that turned out! /s

[-] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I feel that some of the best DC movies are when they are completely discomnected from a "bigger picture".

Give us a feel good Justice Society movie and a utopian sci-fi Legion of Superheroes.

Those two have already been done in the Tomorrowverse. Though the quality of those films are questionable...

[-] Echo5@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Iirc isn’t rotten tomatoes where you want to wait for the audience score because the critics are often out of tune with the audience? Not that I’m disinclined to believe the movie’s bad though, like you said DCEU has been pretty abysmal.

[-] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah. Aquaman is fun. And incredibly derivative.

Critics are still mad they're being forced to watch "superman, but underwater". I get that, I feel for them. But I don't feel for them enough to actually stop giving money to movies like "superman, but underwater".

[-] delitomatoes@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

I think they may go the MCU way this time and start working up with D Listers. If you can make Blue Beetle or Lobo or whatever unknowns work in a good movie, the. You get half a decade before the big hitters reappear and are anticipated.

Just put the A team on the animated series who seem to be doing a better job

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Remember when Jered Lettuce morbed all over his enemies in that epic scene in Morbius, the 2022 masterpiece? Yeah, me neither, but I heard it was totally awesome. They should hone in on that, do stuff with timelines and bring him back as Morbius, the eponymous hero of the 2022 masterpiece Morbius and then have the entire cinematic universe revolve around him, since he already has awesome brand recognition and everybody likes him. Also, everything should be dark, depressing and gritty. Great idea, right?

Right?

Guys?

[-] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 10 months ago

How could you mention Morbius morbing all over those guys without saying his catchphrase?

"It's time to Morb."

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

That is indeed his catchphrase, it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] variants@possumpat.io 4 points 10 months ago

I like the dark gritty depressing bit but not sure of anything else you're talking about

[-] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah. There was so much wasted potential in the DCEU.

But I don't consider Aquaman wasted potential at all. I'm a fan of the comic, but the source material never tried to be Black Panther, so a movie that did wouldn't have worked anyway.

Considering "The Aquaman" made it to 2 films, I figure Hasbro will be calling Jason Mamoa to star in a "Seaspray" movie any minute. Maybe have him cameo as Boat-guy-wity-parrot in a GI Joe movie, just for good measure.

My hopes for James Gunns version are pretty high. PeaceMaker is so lovingly made.

I do worry because I haven't seen James Gunn take on the unironically uplifting side of DC yet, and it needs to be there for the DCU to work.

[-] UnaSolaEstrellaLibre@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I hate WB with a passion with how they fumbled the DCEU. What a shitshow.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Hey, it's not as if they could have involved the people who did the animated series or the Arrowverse TV series, both of which have been very successful.

[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I’m just confused at what the continuity is now. So with Aquaman 2, that’s the last of the old stuff and now it’s being rebooted with Gunn as DC’s Kevin Feige-esque person in charge? I feel like he’s been in that roll for over a year now, yet everything that’s been released is all part of the old continuity and was going to get phased out, so what was the point of all that then? Releasing stuff for a universe that’s getting scrapped (though will likely show up in 5-10 years in some crisis on infinity earths story or something).

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Movie making and planning takes a lot of time and money. It's done in advance. You can't just stop everything that's been in production from releasing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

The thing I would have done? Don't hire Zack Snyder to start a cinematic universe. And also tell him to take his daughter to a mental health professional.

My hope for the future is that they actually do a Justice League movie based on "The New Frontier".

[-] sagrotan@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

As long as Jason can continue to travel around the world in his jet, everything will be good. Right? Right??

[-] ours@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I was hoping it would be better than this. Aquaman 1 was not masterpiece but with James Wan flavor it was at least interesting.

[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Is it me, or he seems very high in the photo? Like a full deluxe package of weed after party, high.

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

That money could have saved starving refugees.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
133 points (92.4% liked)

Movies

7389 readers
137 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS