190
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

This incident actually does a great job of illustrating one of the many problems with policing in America. The cops do something that on its face, to literally anyone watching, is incredibly embarrassing, and that any reasonable person would say was obviously the fault of the police. Instead of profusely apologizing and immediately determining how to make restitution, they turn it around and dehumanize and arrest the victim. They’re so suspicious, afraid, and spiteful of the people they are sworn to protect, that taking the least bit of personal responsibility and showing genuine respect for anyone but themselves is seen as weakness, when in fact it would be the ultimate show of strength to admit when they’ve done something wrong and to immediately try to make it right.

And they wonder why no one trusts them. Respect breeds respect. Show me genuine respect, and I’ll show it right back to you. That’s how human relationships work. But crash into my business with your patrol car, shoot my dog during a no-knock raid on the wrong address, detain me without trial in inhumane and tortuous conditions, pull over every single one of my black friends for literally nothing, all without due process or cause, and you don’t deserve my respect. You deserve my unfiltered rage, and that’s what you’ll continue to get until you show us some goddamn decency. Or quit. Just fucking quit. No one is forcing you to be a cop.

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

the people they are sworn to protect

Do they swear to protect still? I know the court ruled they have no obligation to protect.

https://prospect.org/justice/police-have-no-duty-to-protect-the-public/

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Damn that was hard to read, thanks for sharing. I knew Scalia was a POS, but wow.

the Court ruled that that the state did not have a special obligation to protect a citizen against harms it did not create.

What a ridiculous way of thinking.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

Right? Like what even is the point of the state in his twisted opinion?

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

they crashed into it on purpose.. it was a terrorist attack..

[-] stown@sedd.it 35 points 2 years ago

Another fine example of police officers hard at work. Only the best and brightest.

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 years ago

maybe the owner shouldn't have put his bar in the middle of the officer's road!

[-] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 years ago

Police officers like those should never be allowed to wear a badge again. And any police department that doesn't take away their badges needs to be eliminated and rebuilt from the ground up with entirely new management. That is the only way we will ever get these transgressions to stop.

Step one in dealing with any unacceptable behavior is to make sure there are serious consequences. We are utterly failing to do that with the police.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

"Who built this bar here to ruin cop cars? Arrest them!"

[-] robotopera@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago
[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

They do, but haven't released the footage. The lawyer for the owner has footage from bystanders and probably the bar itself that so far contradicts statements made by the police. They already demonstrated that the arresting officer lied on his PC statement which resulted in the felony charge being reduced. I don't understand why any prosecutor would want to take this case to court, but somehow they haven't dropped all the charges yet.

[-] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

It gets worse than that. I live in StL so I got to hear all about this one. The prosecutor was recently forced out of office for screwing literally everything in the office up so badly that all but a couple of the attorneys quit. Cases were getting dismissed or delayed because DAs weren't showing up to court on the first day of trial, because many times they weren't being told they had been assigned the case. People weren't getting paid, and defendants were languishing in jail for months before any action was taken on their case.

The head of the prosecutors office was not showing up to work, apparently working on a health science degree or something and was basically doing everything but her job and she fought every attempt to kick her out.

Things have started getting better since she was removed but there is a HUGE mess to clean up in the STL justice system right now so if this bar owner has to go through the courts getting any kind of resolution will take a long time. I hope he has a good attorney with a lot of patience and tenacity because he's going to need it.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

You'd think problems in the prosecutor's office would lead to people being released, not held longer. Murrica!

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Police need hobbies too ya know.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
190 points (97.5% liked)

News

36776 readers
429 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS