379
submitted 10 months ago by Simmumah@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 43 points 10 months ago

I’ll believe it when I see it.

[-] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

In that case you won't believe it

[-] spudwart@spudwart.com 35 points 10 months ago

Chances are this won't happen. But it would be a good distraction to pass a different bill.

Eitherway, this has the makings of a smart political move.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Why does everyone on Lemmy tack on that second half? There's a culture here that there can never be progress, even when there is progress in front of our eyes. It's really dangerous.

It's like r/nothingisreal or whatever tf

[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

It's called pattern recognition

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

It's just being pragmatic. The chances of a bill like this even making it to a vote are slim to none, considering the current political climate.

The majority of our politicians are beholden to the ultra rich, so they're not going to vote against their own best interests.

I mean, they haven't even raised minimum wage in like 15 years, even though there has been a 45% inflation.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

That's not what any of the criticism is. It's that it's not enough and only for optics. Same for every progressive win.

Not sure what the rest of your comments have to do with this thread

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 10 months ago

Can't wait to see the loopholes that'll be implemented when the bill is finalized.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Great after the Democrats lose control of Congress they have a plan of legislation they would like to pass. Good job

[-] clide7029@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

In other related news, the IRS has been heavily auditing wealthy people the last several months and has apparently brought in $20 of tax revenue for each dollar spent on the audits. Maybe if we finally start taxing the rich we won't have to eat them....

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Sounds like election year politicking and pandering

[-] oxideseven@lemmy.ca -1 points 10 months ago

Claudia De la Cruz is running for President.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
379 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4526 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS