131
submitted 1 year ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@beehaw.org
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

And absolutely nothing will continue to happen because the only way to remove them from their office is impeachment and fat fucking chance of that ever happening.

It is genuinely time for Democrats to see the writing on the walls, expand the court, use the expanded court to institute ethics rules and term limits, and watch as the scum just up and retires from their seat because they clearly won't be able to follow ethics rules. They will walk, I guarantee it. Now just getting enough Democrats to make it happen.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pfft the democrats are in on it. Just look at Pelosi getting away with insider trading. They're all in on it together, there aren't republicans and democrats there's the corrupt government taking our money.

Don't forget Clinton and Trump both liked visiting Epstein's island.

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

How is Alito even worse than Clarence Thomas? He must have been eating his fascist flakes that morning.

[-] Spiker@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Honestly our Supreme Court is fucked

[-] xuxebiko@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Its the nation this lawless SCOTUS is fucking over.

[-] naughtynumbernine@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Yet these people live and breathe without any single check on their power. How could this be?

[-] Toxic_Tiger@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Greatest Country on Earth*

some exclusions apply

[-] swope@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At what point do lawyers cite a SCOTUS decision as precident and their opposition is like "yeah but that's an Alito decision" and they're like "oh yeah, oops."

[-] Froyn@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

So if I'm caught bribing a politician through their spouse, that's cool because I can point back to this SCOTUS precedent right?

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Surprised Pikachu

Not really, though.

[-] gaylord@lemmy.k6qw.com 1 points 1 year ago

What does this matter, is there any information or proof that she would not have been able to lease the land even if he and FOUR OTHER JUSTICES didn't write an opinion that, spoiler alert, only limited the EPAs ability to write things down and then treat them as law (in the same way the ATF or the FCC have created rules which create new crimes out of the scope of the powers afforded to them through legislation passed by congress)?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
131 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22057 readers
18 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS