677

Kellyanne Conway thinks Republicans can win back women in 2024 by saying, “We took away your abortion rights, but we’re letting you keep contraception” (www.vanityfair.com)

submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

117 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Something you’ve probably heard by now is that the Republican Party’s decision to decimate reproductive rights—and celebrate the overturning of Roe v. Wade like it was the greatest thing to ever happen to America—has not gone over great with voters. The 2022 midterm elections, which were supposed to be a red tsunami for the GOP, were anything but: Democrats picked up a seat in the Senate and Republicans just barely took back the House, with voters in critical states citing abortion as the most important issue of the day. A year later, the right to an abortion was enshrined in Ohio’s state constitution; Kentucky voters reelected pro-choice governor Andy Beshear; and Democrats took control of Virginia’s state legislature, preventing the GOP governor from limiting abortion moving forward, which he’d planned to do. The results were unambiguous: The American people want abortion rights.

Now, with the 2024 election less than a year away, what are Republicans running for higher office to do? According to GOP strategist and Donald Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway, the answer is simple: make their campaign slogan something like, “Yeah, we took away your reproductive rights, but, hey, we’re letting you keep contraception, and that’s something!”

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago

Conservative Blowhard Says Something Dumb, News at 11.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I say this from the bottom of my heart….

Fuck off Kelly.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Kellyanne Spillway, as on point as ever.

Many people are saying she was behind the bowling green massacre. More and more.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I don't know that "we admit we made your lives worse, but look what we could have done and be thankful" is the big sell Kellyanne seems to think.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

"Look, I've beaten your half to death, but I could have beaten your FULLY to death! Vote for me!"

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

She should try running on that.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

She is the most specialest flavor of stupid.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Fool-proof plan. I highly encourage them to spread this message.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Okay, so did she actually say that? Because this author is using quotes a lot and I think they don’t understand “air quotes” aren’t actual real quotes.

Is there a video? Audio?

[-] esc27@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Anyone else keep misreading “voters in critical states” as “voters in critical thinking states”

[-] pozbo@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

K.C. is a failed abortion.

[-] carnimoss@lemmings.world 3 points 10 months ago

It's only failed if we stop trying

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Thats way super thoughtful. Thank you so much.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The only thing I can think of in response to this is that meme of a crying cat giving a thumbs up

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Well, we all know how delusional they are...

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Simple: Don't believe it.

[-] tillary@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It honestly doesn't matter what they choose to say because nobody will believe them anyway. And not that this will persuade voters in the near future, but maybe they should try writing contraception rights into the constitution. That would at least be a good start.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024

677 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers

2039 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News