412
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ronalicious@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

i am feeling so impatient. just throw this asshat in federal prison already.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Indeed. The only place he should go after MarALago and the court rooms.

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago

that just means we're done with the GOP

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Sadly the GOP isn’t done with us.

[-] CaptainAlchemy@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

"in Soviet america, you don't vote for GOP, GOP votes for you!"

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

that's what THEY think, son

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

They've already tried their shit in a small town. Got hit by a chair, and someone swam in from two counties over to beat their asses. Didn't need guns or weapons, just a wholesome ass beating.

[-] Biff@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

"If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism, they will abandon democracy." - David Frum

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago
[-] Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Been that way for a while now

[-] Baylahoo@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago
[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

while I get and in many ways agree with the sentiment, it is truthful to assert that there was a time when if the Republican Party lost elections, they would actually change their platform and try to win back voters. As American popular culture has shifted more and more to the left, however, now that it's pretty much unthinkable for the electoral map of 1984 to happen again, and they see it as an existential threat.

[-] Baylahoo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

You make a good point. I just wasn't alive to see that level of self reflection from the Rebublican party.

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Anyone under 30-40 pretty much only knows the GOP as the party of "Obama is a MMUSL1M!1!!!", but like, it was the Nixon Administration that created the EPA. It's also difficult because much of the economic issues we've experienced from 2008 onwards are because of the Clinton Administration, so the "both parties are the same" argument can be pretty compelling. You could definitely make the argument that in the 90s, they were, but Beau of the Fifth Column on YouTube put it well:

You walk into a bar to find an ATM while on a road trip with your very visibly-queer friend. The bar is full of MAGA hats. Do you feel comfortable leaving your friend out front while you look for the ATM, and maybe take a leak? Now imagine the bar is full of "Vote Blue no Matter Who" shirts.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Judge Cannon watches Fox News? That's quite the surprise

[-] lasagna@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Thought they were just starting their war on it?

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
412 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19072 readers
1805 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS