35

On brand, but I guess SpaceX has no path to profitability (go figure), so Starlink has to launch thousands of microsatellites every year cause their orbit is so low that they burn up like right away

I didn't really have high expectations for them of course but they are way below the bar of what even Tesla brings to the table.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zoift@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

SpaceX works because the US is happy to privatize and sell NASA off piecemeal. Its been propped up by federal money since its inception.

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Wasting Earth's finite supply of rocket fuel on mindless consumption rather than solving the mysteries of the universe is a special kind of failure on capitalism's part.

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Not to mention cluttering our orbit with even more useless junk, making it that much harder for actual scientific endeavors to get into space

[-] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

The main practical application I've seen for starlink is to use it to operate cruise missiles/drones in remote parts of the world

[-] spectre@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Surely they could do that with satellites that don't immediately burn up?

I only support climate pledge friendly cruise missiles

[-] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure they could, this is just using the toys they have now while they last

[-] voight@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Starlink being a system of orbital mines meant to create issues for nations with competent space programs

[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

It’s plausible as the economics of Starlink seem to be very shaky.

this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23822 readers
46 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS