271
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 90 points 10 months ago

It also sends your IMAP credentials to their servers and receives the mail there, it's not done locally like the older versions.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Fuuuuuck that~

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 10 months ago

The twisted reasoning is probably so that the users can access the emails anywhere with their live account (and so that MS can scrape those mails for all sorts of creepy shit)

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 months ago

Just to do it, IMAP already covers using multiple devices on an email account.

[-] square252@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

„Better user experience“ they said.

[-] garrett@infosec.pub 6 points 10 months ago

This is the worst part to me. All this just to “cloud sync” or something silly.

[-] petrescatraian@libranet.de 1 points 10 months ago

@MangoPenguin yet their free tier for their cloud services is still lacking...

@Blaze

[-] original_reader@lemm.ee 57 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Kinda OT, but writing about privacy and then presenting an abysmal way to opt out of 160+ trackers is pure, hypocritical, rich irony.

Yes, I'm talking to you, ghacks.net.

[-] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 38 points 10 months ago

Remember when Microsoft pushed hard on marketing "don't be Scroogled" for this stuff?

[-] technomad@slrpnk.net 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 24 points 10 months ago

Good call. Here's a snapshot of scroogled.com in 2013 from the wayback machine.

Google goes through every Gmail that's sent or received, looking for keywords so they can target Gmail users with paid ads. And there's no way to opt out of this invasion of your privacy. Outlook.com is different—we don't go through your email to sell ads.

[-] Thorned_Rose@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

This didn't age well. Not that Microsoft were above board back then either.

[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 10 months ago

always been

[-] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago

Any outlook alternative that doesn't look pre-dotcom? I really liked the Microsoft Mail app for its simplicity and the ability to have multiple inboxes, it's a shame it is being replaced by outlook.

[-] sab@kbin.social 25 points 10 months ago

Thunderbird still isn't too much of a looker, but it got a lot better recently after they added the vertical layout and made a bunch of smaller improvements. I've been using it for a few months now (after having avoiding it for maybe a decade), and I'm pretty enthusiastic about it.

[-] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

I tried using it a while back but went back to Mail app. Will try again, esp since I'm planning to move to Ubuntu as the main os.

[-] sab@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Good luck! Aesthetically I find Geary to be the best client for GNOME, but Thunderbird has more advanced features and broader support. :)

[-] jasep@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I've been looking at options for my older clients as MS has been pushing this new Outlook client. Thunderbird is unfortunately fugly compared to more modern looking apps. I haven't been successful transitioning any of those older folks to using Thunderbird as it's too different for them.

I've been rolling back the Outlook installs but it's just a bandaid. I'd love to hear that's there's a comparable replacement to the W10 mail app.

[-] Thorned_Rose@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

There's also Betterbird, a fork of Thunderbird which retains some user-liked features that Mozilla removed as well as some bug fixes.

[-] ulkesh@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

Spark, Mailbird, eM Client, Mailspring.

Most of the modern ones do store certain information on servers, though. Spark and Mailbird both do. Mailspring does as well if I recall correctly.

Most modern mail app developers seem to think that it’s more important to do search indexing and account storage on a server for ease of use, and expect inherent trust, foregoing all sense of real privacy under the veil of “we’re not evil, we promise.”

I’ve yet to find an email client that has a good modern look and feel, but doesn’t try to use server-side storage for some UX convenience factor.

I want the look and feel and mail host integrations of Spark (OAuth, like GMail, or preconfigs of hosts like iCloud) with the dumb-pipe-ness of Thunderbird. That’s the email unicorn I’m after.

[-] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] ares35@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

uninstall the 'new' outlook app and use the 'old' mail app if you must. can at least do that, until they forcibly remove the old one and migrate users.

the new-look thunderbird is ok, as is emclient (proprietary but free-to-use version is available).

[-] beatle@aussie.zone 28 points 10 months ago

Mozilla Thunderbird is free and open source (foss)

[-] ulkesh@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

Exactly. I mean there are numerous mail applications for Windows. We’re not limited to just mail apps from Microsoft.

[-] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 10 points 10 months ago

It's a microsoft product, What the fuck do you expect?

[-] Asudox@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

no shit sherlock

this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
271 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16263 readers
83 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS