71
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Just five days remain until a key government funding deadline, and even after congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle announced a deal to avert a shutdown until March, the schedule leaves little room for error.

On Sunday night, House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer released text for a continuing resolution to extend government funding into March, legislation that will need to pass both chambers of Congress before the end of this week in order to avoid a partial lapse in government funding.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] politicalincorruption@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

Watching these bozo Republicans play chicken with our economy with every budget deal is like watching rehashed episodes jammed into “new” episodes of a worn out television show that should have been canceled years ago.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Yeah, it's gotten old about the first time they tried pulling this bullshit. Something has got to give soon, or we are fucked.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Mike Johnson:

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

Ross Thomas was a Washington reporter turned crime novelist. His thrillers almost always revolve around corruption and/or dirty politics. In one over-the-top book, "The Fool's In Town Are On Our Side," a band of mercenaries is hired to clean up a small Southern city. The plan is to make things so bad that 'even the pimps will vote for reform.'

Somewhere, Mr. Thomas is laughing his ass off.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Just five days remain until a key government funding deadline, and even after congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle announced a deal to avert a shutdown until March, the schedule leaves little room for error.

Johnson said in a statement the short-term spending bill “is required to complete what House Republicans are working hard to achieve: an end to governance by omnibus, meaningful policy wins, and better stewardship of American tax dollars.”

Caught between hardliners and moderates and navigating an extremely narrow majority, Johnson is under intense pressure and has already faced fierce criticism from conservatives over a topline spending deal he struck with Schumer, which was announced earlier this month.

The topline deal has set in motion a bipartisan effort to negotiate full-year spending bills, but there is still much more work to be done in that process, and the consensus on Capitol Hill is that both chambers must pass a short-term funding extension this week or else trigger a shutdown.

Congress passed stopgap legislation in November extending government funding until January 19 for priorities including military construction, veterans’ affairs, transportation, housing and the Energy Department.

A large number of House Republicans, however, have warned that a Senate compromise over border security stands virtually no chance of passing their chamber, making clear instead they will only accept a deal that mirrors the hardline immigration bill HR 2.


The original article contains 1,215 words, the summary contains 224 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] thrawn@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

So, why is Johnson doing this? I think it’s possible they’re just talking their usual bullshit and won’t actually boot him, but they totally could. I don’t follow politics enough to understand his motives here.

It would be a decent bet to gather favor with the majority of the party, even if ousted, but politicians only really have a brief phase of enough public attention to rise meteorically. I think being ousted would end any shot at that kind of upward trajectory.

Just kind of odd to me that veritable loony Mike Johnson is acting reasonably and with like, some vague facsimile of courage. I guess he could still back out. But all of this is confusing to me if he sees it through

this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
71 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19107 readers
1994 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS