214
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 119 points 10 months ago

They really offered 2 possible outcomes:

  • Increase prices
  • Fire people

Why not just . . . make less money?

The increase was $4. The article kept using percentages to make it seem like some big scary change, but the increase is 1 meal per hour per worker. I'm pretty sure any half decent restaurant can handle that extra $4 per worker hourly.

But no, the solution is clearly to just nuke your vacation policy so you can save $1000 per worker per year. Yeah okay.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 118 points 10 months ago

American notions of profit and loss are fucked up.

It doesn't matter if you're profitable. Let me say that again. It does not matter if you're profitable.

You have to be making MORE profit than you did same time last year, last quarter, last month.

If you don't keep making more profit, you are somehow "losing money". Money that's "rightfully owed" to you. Money that should and would have otherwise been yours.

And if you're a publicly held company and you miss that profit goal, the stock market will PUNISH you.

Hell, you could make more profit and STILL get punished if you didn't "beat expectations".

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

That's because investors only make money when the value goes up. The pressure to always make more money than before is baked into the public ownership system we created. I think we should make all companies employee owned instead of investor owned and then you'd fix the broken incentive structure.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 95 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"Eliminating employee vacation"

His workers had an average 48 hours of yearly vacation time. That is not vacation time.

What trash

[-] MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com 26 points 10 months ago

At $20 that’s less than a thousand dollars a year.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 89 points 10 months ago

Mark owns fatburger franchises and he and his family are BARELY scraping by... They only took two European vacations last year and their kid that just turned 16 had to get a tesla instead of electric Porsche? It's just not sustainable and this ASSAULT needs to stop or hard working vampires like Mark and his loved ones suffer.

Edit: oh, that's weird... Autocorrect formed "families" into "vampires".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 75 points 10 months ago

Never once crossed his mind to take less from the top. American businesses should fail more often.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago

Boohoo, a capitalist that owns 4 restaurants is passing the costs of labor on to their customers and is still blaming us for it. Sounds like the playbook of an abuser.

If paying people what they are worth causes businesses to fail, then that is just Daddy Capitalism working right?

[-] Damdy@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

For sure, record breaking profits never get passed on to the customer, if anything it pushes companies to see how much they can squeeze from nothing.

But hard times always fall on the customer.

Greed is evil.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 48 points 10 months ago

"how will I buy my next four franchises if I have to pay my employees a living wage?"

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MrMeanJavaBean@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

If a business cannot survive paying its employees a liveable wage then it should not exist. Businesses that do not pay a livable wage but can afford to are exploiting its employees.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Raz@lemm.ee 35 points 10 months ago

Lol, 48 hours of paid time off. I don't even work full time and get 120 hours, by law. Fuck the US.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] licherally@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

eliminating employee vacation

Man shut the fuck up, the only employee that got a vacation was you numbnuts

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

Walberg said he used to offer paid time off to eligible workers. The average worker earned about 48 hours of paid time off, capped at 72 hours a year, he said.

Jesus fucking Christ. Shit like that has been illegal for a century where I live

[-] licherally@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

America is a dystopia unlike any other, where we smile and fuck each other over and then say "hey this is just the way it is!"

I hate it here.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Pepsi@kbin.social 30 points 10 months ago

TLDR: “Hey, everybody. I'm a stupid moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt smells, and I like to kiss my own butt.”

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 28 points 10 months ago

If you’re in L.A. Make sure to boycott Fatburger.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 26 points 10 months ago

The paid vacation he's eliminating was capped at 72hrs per year. He warns that high schoolers will have a tough time competing with more valuable employees, but this is due to the wage increase only applying to fast food. Also, the big layoffs in in-house delivery are similarly due to the narrow scope of the law which excludes gig workers.

"Landlords won't lower their rents"-- these things take time.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago

“Landlords won’t lower their rents”-- these things take time.

For sure. A market correction on landlords require businesses leaving the property and then the landlords defaulting their loans to the bank. But no matter what that still needs to happen, because an economy where we value parasitic capital over paying labor a living wage is fundementally broken.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

If you can't do business in CA, then don't. OR treat your employees like shit. Sure.

[-] HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 10 months ago

Not one fucking word in this article about what the ratfuck owner clears every year from his four franchises. Nobody bothers to ask the question, because wage increases are a sin borne only by the consumer, so sayeth supply-side Jesus.

A building full of well paid employees serving high quality food can pay for the building, the livelihood of all its employees and all of the quality food used to make its offerings. But it can't pay for all that PLUS the guy sitting on top of it all skimming off $100K every year while literally doing nothing. HUH. Well, fuck 'em.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kittyjynx@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

In N Out in California pays $20 or more an hour starting wages, their burgers are (IIRC) less than $5, and they still make a shit ton of money.

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Defending scamming as a business model isn’t a business model.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Eliminating employee vacation, as though he was already offering them some extravagant amount of paid time off. And what does he think cutting hours will accomplish? You either have enough people working the store, or you don't. Running a skeleton crew and overworking your people isn't going to be sustainable, not when literally every other fast food place is paying at least as much as you and they have choices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mamertine@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

The new California law doesn't apply to employees at full-service chains such as Chili's or Cheesecake Factory.

That's really strange. A minimum wage for just fast food?

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Full-service chains have their own minimums because of our shitty tipping culture.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago

Oh no! What will those poor employees do now that they can work at literally any fast food chain for $20/hr!

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago

I REALLY want to see the last few years of profit margins that these asshats are earning that are so vital to maintain that they are “forced” to pass the financial hit on to their workers (who are doing ALL the actual work). "If the minimum wage goes up, they either have to increase prices so that they can cover the increased expenses for labor, or they're going to have to consolidate their labor and let people go," Lederman told BI. Thanks Lederman, you tone deaf douchnozzle. Why can’t they earn slightly less profits so everyone can, I dunno, live their fucking lives?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

Ok, then show us your books or I'll assume you are full of shit

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
214 points (93.5% liked)

Antiwork

3632 readers
1 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS