189
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Beeper users say Apple is now blocking their Macs from using iMessage entirely::The Apple-versus-Beeper saga is not over yet it seems, even though the iMessage-on-Android Beeper Mini was removed from the Play Store last week. Now,

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Merlin404@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago

FUCK APPLE, but they have so many people that let them ass fuck them they continue to do shits like this

[-] vmachiel@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago

Devils advocate here: it’s their webservice right? They determine who can access it.

If there were legislation that would force them to make it interoperable that would be one thing. But you can’t just demand access to their infrastructure.

[-] Deebster@programming.dev 41 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You're right - but, as Cory Doctorow points out, Apple owe their success to reverse engineering, the very thing they're busy blocking now.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 9 points 9 months ago

They're not blocking reverse engineering. They're blocking unauthorized access to their servers.

[-] Deebster@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago

You're being unnecessarily pedantic. Apple was blocking interoperability and reverse engineering found a solution—and Apple is blocking that solution.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm not being remotely pedantic.

Apple reverse-engineered MS standards to improve interoperability so you could open Apple files on Windows and vise versa. They didn't reverse engineer Windows security so that you could open Apple files on MS servers.

[-] Deebster@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Apple reverse engineered a file format, Beeper reverse engineered a protocol.

Microsoft made several changes to try to keep Apple out, Apple's also made several changes to keep Beeper out, except now everyone's online so it's happening way faster.

It's not exactly the same kind of reverse engineering, but I never said it was. I think you've got a very narrow definition of reverse engineering in your head and you're quibbling over me using it more broadly than you would.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 34 points 9 months ago

No one is saying what they do is illegal, people just say they are cunts.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Exactly, dick moves don’t need to be illegal to be dick moves. It’s like the constant price/ad increases. You can, but we’re gonna bitch and encourage people to stop supporting you because it’s a dick move

[-] beatle@aussie.zone 4 points 9 months ago

Agreed. Apple provides a free service locked to their hardware. It shouldn’t be surprising that they patched the vulnerabilities and blocked accounts.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They have interoperability. There are 1000+ interoperable messaging platforms you can use on iOS. Problem is they're not "convenient" since SMS is the only interoperable standard that EVERY phone already has and you can't use any other messaging app with SMS fallback, which is the only feature iMessage has that the others don't.

There needs to be legislation that requires them to have unlockable bootloaders, to allow 3rd party app stores, and to be able to use other apps for SMS. And it needs to happen 10 years ago.

The fact that you need Apple's permission before you can install any software on your device, and that Apple gets 30% of EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DIME YOU SEND in literally any fucking app is appalling and embarrassing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 40 points 9 months ago

You know what to do, the EU Government.

[-] tostiman@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They already have

TL;DR: imessage and other big message services must be able to send messages to each other (when

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

iMessage isn't included in that act, since it's not big enough in Europe.

[-] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

As said by noodlejetski, iMessage usage in the EU is very low. It hasn't been excempt completely though, it's pending investigation.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl -1 points 9 months ago

What exactly are you implying they should do?

Apple has already agreed to adopt RCS. Although the exact implementation they didn't specify and will likely be "bare minimum".

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Are there any FOSS RCS apps for Android?

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 9 months ago

The only RCS apps, to my knowledge are Google Messages and Samsung Messages.

Not sure why.

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

Well as I can't use either of those on my degoogled Android device, Apple using RCS is irrelevant, and they should use a more open standard, like Matrix.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago

Matrix is a terrible standard but otherwise I agree.

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

What do you suggest, I was just giving an example.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago

Signal protocol is probably the best open standard?

Hard to say, they all come with their compromises but Matrix would never work, it's just too slow.

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 9 months ago

Signal removed it's RCS support:(

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago

Signal never had RCS support

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 9 months ago

Actually, I was thinking it was RCS. It was regular text messages. Thanks for the correction.

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately RCS is on the carrier side. The most basic chat system built in by the phone carrier will likely have RCS.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 10 points 9 months ago

Why would you use an OS from a company that openly messes with everything it gives you?

ICQ died for a small fraction of what they are doing, going from the default IM (in some countries, including mine) to something with only red flowers seen in the buddylist when you launch it once a month to get that sleepy graveyard nostalgic feeling, and that happened in a few months.

Now trojans are seen as normal by people who understand that they are talking about a trojan.

We often treat "normies" as people for whom fashion\easiness is more important than the reality of what they are choosing.

But apparently it's come to the situation where they just can't escape Apple, MS, Google, others, due to knowledge lacking and being hostage to some functionality and network effects, if such mechanisms are socially relevant now.

Interesting to see this dynamic of choosing protest over using something else.

Almost like all that late XIX and early XX century spirit with Marx and worker movements, only from consumers, really weird.

[-] accideath@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Why? Because Windows is shit and Linux can’t run the software I need. Also, the Apple OSes are generally pretty nice to use, if you ignore the Apple shenanigans.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -5 points 9 months ago

Because Windows is shit and Linux can’t run the software I need.

I've already answered something like that, but less specific, for you, it was a rhetorical question.

Also, the Apple OSes are generally pretty nice to use, if you ignore the Apple shenanigans.

I've tried and felt that Windows may not be so bad, but to each his own.

[-] halva@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

like the other person said, modern windows is infinitely worse in just about every aspect of its design (you have to fight it if you just want to use your computer without microsoft 3rd wheeling it) and linux app support ranges from "ok" to "straight up doesn't exist and cannot be ran through any shenanigans"

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Well, I'm a Linux user to the degree that then I argue about other systems, it's just to blabber, I'm not really interested. It's "here be dragons" for me, some epilepsy-inducing horror on one side and Johnny Ive (or whatever it is now) on another.

So feel free to not put much effort =)

[-] Killer_Tree@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

ICQ... Now there's a name I haven't heard in a long time. I used to use the crap out of that service, but I can't for the life of me recall what killed it anymore than I can recall migrating from AIM.

[-] beefontoast@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Microsoft pushed msn messenger as a default in windows... Autostarted the app on login, made a million popups asking people to use it.. People stared using it. Usual story.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Maybe somewhere, but where I lived everybody moved to Skype. It was technologically full of wizardry to make it work on bad channels, had fast file transfers, convenient GUI, groups (which ICQ didn't have, but everybody would just use web forums or web chats or, ah, IRC).

Some time ago I recovered my Skype history, googled how to retrieve it and read it from those files. I cringed so hard.

[-] kuneho@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I kinda liked Windows Messenger/MSN/Windows Live Messenger with all its quirks.

There were even a few MSN apps for Android back then, like Epinephrine. It was nice. I could even use MSN from my Sony Ericsson W595 through eBuddy and Bluetooth PAN networking.

Sadly, Facebook killed it and for some reason, they thought it would be nice to kill it off in favor of Skype, which never worked as intended and was a really heavy boy to run.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

They started breaking alternative clients intentionally with small protocol changes. Instead of just eating it everybody changed IMs, fast.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Now, Apple customers who used Beeper’s apps are reporting that they’ve been banned from using iMessage on their Macs — a move Apple may have taken to disable Beeper’s apps from working properly, but ultimately penalizes its own customers for daring to try a non-Apple solution for accessing iMessage.

But the latter only found short-lived success, as Apple quickly figured out how to disable Beeper Mini from being able to reliably deliver messages.

The tech giant’s actions soon caught the attention of lawmakers, leading a bipartisan group of legislators to implore the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate Apple’s “potential anticompetitive treatment” of the Beeper Mini application.

Admitting up front that third-party software was to blame would sometimes result in the support rep being able to lift the ban, some noted.

As for Apple, it originally said Beeper techniques had “posed significant risks to user security and privacy, including the potential for metadata exposure and enabling unwanted messages, spam, and phishing attacks.”

Beeper put an end to its efforts to continue to develop an iMessage solution last month after releasing its latest software.


The original article contains 584 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] colforge@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I know I’ll get downvotes for this but I switched from Android to iPhone after years and years of using Android while knowing I wouldn’t be able to use iMessage features texting Android users. While knowing I couldn’t and would likely never be easily able to sideload apps, heck even after they had already taken the headphone jack away. I literally do not care about any of that for the purpose for which I use my phone. I just want it to work, without having to endlessly tweak and customize and modify. I like that it does what it says it does out of the box and does so smoothly and reliably.

I like that it integrates well with other apple products. I have exactly 3 contacts I use the native messaging app for. The rest have all been communicating with me through Messenger or Telegram or WhatsApp for years anyway — I’d MUCH rather see governments prioritize making those services talk to each other so I could uninstall two of them but I don’t ever see anyone talking about that even though Apple haters love to bash Apple over iMessage - while ignoring that the RCS protocol Google uses has proprietary bullshit built on top of it meaning that even if Apple adopted the protocol itself the interaction between iPhone and android messages would still be messy.

As I said I know I’ll get downvotes for this but I also know I’m far from alone and this is exactly why Apple has the power it does: it gives its users what they want, even if non-Apple users don’t see it that way. I see so many arguments against Apple that fail to take that into account.

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 17 points 9 months ago

I had an iPhone 13 pro max and it was an excellent device. Everything it could do it did very well and had outstanding battery life, build quality, and cameras.

I only got rid of it because I wanted torrents and emulators. If you're aware of the limitations of iOS and you're okay with them, iPhones are really great.

[-] ji17br@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

I don’t think you’re supposed to post reasonable, level-headed opinions regarding Apple on here. Against the rules or something

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 9 months ago

Nah, that was Reddit. We’re humans here, not caricatures.

[-] ji17br@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

Go into any technology thread that mentions Apple in the title and you’ll see that’s not the case. It’s rare to find a comment that uses actual facts, mostly just opinions of people who have never used an Apple product complaining that they suck.

[-] lovesickoyster@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If you're aware of the limitations of iOS

including some stupidly ridiculous ones - like not being to use different volume for the ringer and notifications. Apparently too difficult for apple to implement. 🤦‍♂️

[-] arran4@aussie.zone 2 points 9 months ago

Tried beeper?

[-] Psiczar@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago

I’m constantly amazed at people who whine about Apple, if you don’t like their products or their business model, vote with your wallet and buy Android. Don’t try and hack the system, then bitch when they close the exploits. Apple aren’t the first to lockout compromised hardware and they won’t be the last.

[-] Cerothen@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

I think the issue here is more that interacting with certain companies or services is unavoidable. As an Android user I often will have to interact with iPhone users and the impact of their vendor lock-in techniques is that the experience of those interactions is worse on both sides.

I can't convince every person to stop using an iPhone, or even just just a different messaging app, most people can't even agree what to have for dinner...

So users that take it upon themselves to try and improve the experience by trying things like beeper or beeper mini are actually trying to help others maintain their choices and preferences without the degraded experience.

So sometimes a person voting with their dollars isn't enough, since it's others choices that still have an impact

this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
189 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

58777 readers
2903 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS