664
submitted 9 months ago by DevCat@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

District Judge Lewis Kaplan has said it multiple times: Donald Trump raped E. Jean Carroll in 1996. Kaplan wrote it in May 2023, when he presided over one of the trials against Trump. And he reminded jurors of the rape this week, during the latest proceedings in the multi-layered, winding rape and defamation cases brought against Trump by Carroll.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 170 points 9 months ago

Did she call him the rapist Donald J Trump? The same Donald Trump who raped E Jean Carroll? The woman who was raped by Donald Trump? The same rapist who also raped his wife? The same rapist Donald J Trump who described sexually assaulting woman on a radio show? The same rapist who spied on nude underage girls at his pageant? Because Donald Trump is a rapist as a matter of legal fact.

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 88 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A rapist who is not only sickeningly still walking free, but is the frontrunner for the Nazi party.

I'd say that it's a new low for the Nazi party, but we all know it's not.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

I'd say that it's a new low for the Nazi party, but we all know it's not.

I mean, that has more to do with how low the bar has been set. Trump has been digging diligently for decades, but the bar is halfway through the planet’s mantle.

[-] badbrainstorm@lemmy.today 6 points 9 months ago

Mantle, lol Everybody knows the Nazis fled to hollow earth at Antarctic...

[-] Rookwood@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The thing is, when you allow the single opposing party in our system to run against a literal Nazi party, no one wins. Except the wealthy of course.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 107 points 9 months ago

Trump and his lawyers have been really pissing off both the judge and the jury with how unseriously they're treating the proceedings. They're gonna take two hours (an absurdly short time for a jury) and write a check for $15mil, I bet.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 65 points 9 months ago

Trump will never pay anyone. They're going to have to garnish his pension from being president.

[-] TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I am not a lawyer, but according to this site: https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/will-filing-for-bankruptcy-stop-a-civil-lawsuit.html

"Bankruptcy will stop almost all civil litigation matters except for family court cases involving domestic support obligations, at least temporarily."

He's looking at about 400 mill from the New York Fraud trial.

This is civil litigation. He's going to pull the Rudy G. maneuver.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

It wouldn’t even be the first time he’s had to declare bankruptcy. For the ultra wealthy, bankruptcy doesn’t mean you’re financially ruined; It just means the bank has a bad day when they find out you aren’t repaying them.

There’s an old saying along the lines of “If you owe the bank $100k and can’t repay it, you have a big problem. If you owe the bank $100M and can’t pay it back, the bank has a big problem.”

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 months ago

Bankruptcy doesn't mean you don't have to pay the debts, it means the court is given control of your finances and decides who gets paid from it if you don't have enough to pay everyone. Declaring bankruptcy would result in his accounts being wiped out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

Assuming he doesn't get back in in 2024 (or 2028) and exonerate himself from his own crimes.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

The president cannot pardon state level crimes let alone state level civil judgements.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Okay, sure, buuut... what if his name is Donald Trump and he REEEEEALLY wants to?

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

We listen to him bitch about it for 10+ years and somehow it magically happens by some judge that throws away 100 years of presedent.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago

The President can't declare he won an election he lost. Didn't stop him from trying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Brokkr@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

This is a civil trial, there are no crimes to pardon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

pissing off both the judge and the jury

There’s still one other role for him to piss off if he wants to go for the trifecta.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 9 points 9 months ago

Not in a civil trial, unfortunately.

[-] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I know. I’m just keeping score at home and looking to be able to say “That’s a bingo!”

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think they are likely to return an award for punitive damages that is closer to $150 million.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 31 points 9 months ago

So when is somebody going to sentence this shit weasel?

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago

Rape has a statute of limitations. Even if he came forward and said flat out that he raped her, he can’t be charged criminally for it. He can be charged civilly though, which is why he keeps claiming it never happened.

[-] sandwichfiend@c0tt0n.world 19 points 9 months ago

You yanks and your rapey presidents

@DevCat @politics

[-] Rookwood@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Don't forget our rapey Supreme Court Justices that serve for life and take bribes with no consequence!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
664 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1435 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS