344
submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Boeing Whistleblower: Production Line Has “Enormous Volume Of Defects” Bolts On MAX 9 Weren’t Installed::A reader at respected airline industry site Leeham News offered a comment that suggests they have access to Boeing’s internal quality control systems, and shares details of what they saw regarding the Boeing 737 MAX 9 flown by Alaska Airlines that had a door plug detach inflight, causing rapid decompression of the aircraft. The takeaway appears to be that outsourced plane components have so many problems when they show up at the production line that Boeing’s quality control staff can’t keep up with them all.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 68 points 10 months ago

Bean counter who ordered cuts on QC probably failed upward

[-] 2piradians@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

You'd think corporations would learn from these types of failures. But no, not as long as endless growth is the overall plan. The yes men will keep cutting corners at the expense of safety and quality.

[-] troglodytis@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

So far they've learned the benefit far outweighs the cost

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 17 points 10 months ago

Especially if you can get a new job before something goes wrong. Get an upper management job, strip the metaphorical walls of copper to "cut costs", and use that on your CV to get a C-suite job somewhere else.

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

What do you mean goes wrong?

Boring still isn't suffering for this. They've made their money and will continue to make more.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

“Our QC never finds any major issues, if we cut budget here, here and here we can increase EBIDTA, yada yada MOAR PROFITS since our processes are perfect anyway!”

  • The bean counter
[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

And now that they've laid off all of QC.

QC still never finds any major issues. That means we never needed them.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 39 points 10 months ago

For anyone interested what happened (according to some anonymous whistle-blower):

They had to remove the door plug to replace damaged pressure seal but didn't want to run QA on the plug after installing it back so they didn't mark it as 'removed' in the tracking system, they simply treated it as door that were "opened". Parts were missed when inserting the plug, QA didn't check because it wasn't in the system, plane was delivered to the client. The rest is history.

There' s a lot of backstory to it but that's the direct cause. Supposedly.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

To be fair, the defects SHOULD be found in the production line, but not in the finished product.

[-] neptune@dmv.social 29 points 10 months ago

In something like a commercial airliner you can't afford to just catch the mistakes. You have to prevent them.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In a commercial production line, there are part defects, engineering defects, assembly defects, testing defects, tool defects, etc.

Tens of thousands of parts. Thousands of employees (some new hires). Hundreds of vendors.

You will never prevent all defects, but you should be able to discover them before finishing production.

A lot of these wont even be discovered until they are assembled and it fails a test or inspection point.

[-] neptune@dmv.social 5 points 10 months ago

Absolutely 0.0000000000 defects is impossible.

However, as an engineers, it's troubling to hear Boeing say things like "well we added a few more inspection points". Lack of inspection is a contributing cause but it's not the root cause.

Finding errors at the factory is great and a great way to go out of business (both due to increased cost, as well as eventual escapes)

[-] MondayToFriday@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

Yes, but you can't inspect quality into a product; you have to build it into the product.

Years ago, some American auto executives toured a Toyota factory to learn from them. After the tour, one of them said, "Those sneaky Japanese, they didn't show us their rework area." What he didn't know was that unlike American factories, there was no rework area. Everything was assembled correctly the first time, and any worker had the right to stop the assembly line at any time to fix a problem. It's far easier than finding and fixing a defect that is buried deep in a finished product.

[-] RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Damn. Use some punctuation. Every word capitalized doesn’t help parsing it.

Boeing Whistleblower: Production Line Has “Enormous Volume Of Defects.” Bolts On MAX 9 Weren’t Installed.

[-] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 months ago
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

If true, Boeing will cease to exist in a few years for the amount they are about to be sued.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Boeing is a defense contract darling, so they can never die.

Though, the commercial arm of Boeing could get broken off and sold to another airline if this gets any worse.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago

The names will be changed to protect the guilty.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately, the US government will protect them despite all this, I'm afraid.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago

You know, I’d be perfectly fine if they nationalized the company for as long as it takes to restore a deep and unshakable sense of “you do not fuck with QA” to Boeing.

Their current board and corporate leadership should be prosecuted for criminal negligence for allowing it to get this bad after the MCAS crashes, and moreover after they publicly committed to drastically improving QA and general safety policies following those crashes.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 14 points 10 months ago

The US government will disolve the FAA before they nationalize any industry.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I’m not talking about the whole industry. Boeing is a single company.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

It appears that nationalizing the company and taking 100% of the profit drive out of the loop until after a healthy safety culture has been re-established, would be the only way forward. But consequences? For top level management? That wouldn't even happen in Western Europe - much less in the US.

What's a couple thousand dead "plebs" compared to the pain and suffering that a CEO like Muilenburg, or Calhoun would experience from even an immediate termination of contract without bonuses, god forbid they'd have to face an actual sentence in a criminal trial.

[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

“Time for a multi billion dollar defence contract” -congress.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

sadly, this is exactly what I suspect would happen.

[-] Holyginz@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

What's his nuts saying he changed Boeing so it was run like a business instead of an engineering firm is precisely where things were guaranteed to go to shit. Wasn't a matter of if, only when.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 10 months ago

Time to start arresting people at the top and work your way down. Also Pete Buttigieg needs to answer why it has taken so long for the grounding of the 737 Max 9.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

FAA grounded them the day after the incident

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago

Sorry, thought they only ground Alaskan airlines ones.

[-] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I'm not a fan of Mayor Pete by any stretch of the imagination, but they were quick to ground these.

[-] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

oh boy, so reposting of that comment has now become actual news articles. Oh boy, this will blow up.

here someone reposted it in full on lemmy incl the source: https://lemmy.nowsci.com/comment/4930362

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

People who know more than me have pointed out that the the hole in the fuselage and the plug found on the ground don't show the kind of damage you'd expect if the bolts were present and secure.

So them being absent entirely is consistent with the publicly available evidence.

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
344 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59689 readers
1593 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS