291
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 68 points 9 months ago

The people who need to hear it, won't.

The people with the power to do anything about it, don't care.

The rest of us are just screaming at each other. What the hell will more of that solve?

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

The people who need to hear it are voters. The only people with the power to stop it are voters.

Until the voter turnout for Democrats is close to 100%, any effort to inform the public of what is at stake is warranted.

We can whine about it being hopeless after the election, because if Trump wins it actually will be hopeless.

[-] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 months ago

It makes some people feel like they are doing something.

I totally agree with you.

There is one proven method to deal with fascists 🥰

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

As a European, it's wild to see 2016 just kinda happening all over again. At least that time I too wasn't too worried since, well, how bad could it be?

We should all know a lot better than that by now. Glad to be on this side of the great pond for the time being.

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Canadian here. It feels scary being next door. Especially because the far right happenings in America has emboldened some of that rhetoric and mindset over here. And of course, on top of that, any policy or economic moves the US makes has been impact over here.

It’s scary times and I have no clue what they should do about it. I thought it was all a joke until 2016 and have been questioning everything since.

[-] swearengen@sopuli.xyz 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Glad to be on this side of the great pond for the time being.

That time being 12 months.

If Trump does win, Europe can't count on America to respond properly to it's NATO promises. At best Trump will drag out processes that can't be drugout in order for NATO to remain effective. At worst he'll try and pullout entirely.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Absolutely agreed! When it rains in the US, it drizzles in the EU, no exceptions. I'm under no delusion of absolute safety here.

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Are you admitting refugees?

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Yup, lots of 'em. I expect my country to adhere to EU law & regulation when it comes to it.

[-] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 9 points 9 months ago

What about the political refugees about to flee America if Trump gets elected? I'm non-binary and not a Christian, if the fascists win I don't think I'm welcome here anymore.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago

When Trump won, my stomach sank, because I knew the 2016 election would go on for another 4 years. We're now in year 8 and I'm really hoping it ends for good now.

[-] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

It's a good thing Europe has never had any of these right-wing populist leaders, or you'd look be pretty hypocritical.

[-] atsum@feddit.ch 2 points 9 months ago

Didn't know Europe has a president...

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 28 points 9 months ago

Bruh, we should have started last year when he started paraphrasing Hitler. We should have started when it became known that he had a defacto 30% of the Republican vote as a starting point.

We should be talking about this now, but we need to be treating it like we're now witnessing a replay of Hitler's rise to power. We don't just need to talk about a second presidency, we need to talk about the very likely second coup attempt, his flirtation with dictatorship, and the fight for democracy we're going to have for the next decade at least.

[-] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Historically, the expiration date for a country, before a major revolt or dictatorial uprising, is usually 250 years or so after its founding... That's 2026 for us.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 9 months ago

I've heard that before. I wonder how much of our current state of affairs is organic vs some fascist history-bros who think we're on a schedule.

[-] presbypenguin@reddthat.com 23 points 9 months ago

I mean, what the Hell have we been doing for the last 3 years? Journalists, historians, and other folks have really been ringing this bell since 2016, and started ringing it louder on January 6, 2021. You can only scream the truth so loudly, and hand-wringing that people "aren't talking about it enough" when it has been said publicly by high-profile folks for years seems disingenuous and written to generate clicks.

Yeah, we know. We keep saying it. Stop trying to make it seem like you're the only one who has the chutzpah to say it out loud.

[-] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The problem is that it's just another partisan divide and there aren't a lot of people on the conservative side of the aisle willing to say it. And those that do get thrown into political exile.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

I am honestly suprised no one has taken the Big L on this one. They sure don't remove them from living like they used to when the status quo or old blood was threatened

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

People get assassinated by the Powers That Be when they try to push for more democracy, not less of it.

[-] deanimate@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

There's just too many stupid people in america. that countries main chance is all the old retards dying off so younger people who have some semblance of a working brain will have a higher percentage of the vote

[-] disheveledWallaby@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

One of the reasons Trump appeals to the oligarch class is he will put an end to democracy before the younger generations get a chance to threaten their power.

[-] cheesebag@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

"retards", really? The fuck is this, 2001?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The word is offensive, but likening them to fascists is even more so. The terminology he should've used is something more like "evil motherfucking pieces of shit."

[-] earmuff@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

I read the same headline since months. So nothing will change.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

It's a feature, the people pulling the strings behind trump think a dictatorship would be good for business. It's not trump I'm worried about, it's whomever comes after him, or is pulling the strings that I worry about. Trump is very old, and clearly suffering from some kind of dementia. He's not pulling the strings in what's going on. Behind the scenes there's a coalition of people who want a one party state, that's what should scare people. Trump is a distraction.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Trump is not a distraction, he's their battering ram, and he very much is capable of destroying our checks in balances within a very short amount of time.

Redirecting attention to unarmed untouchable boogeymen who aren't on the ballot is the distraction. Deal with what's in front of your face first.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

We already have a one party state with capital pulling all the strings.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

If we had a one party state there wouldn't be democrats and Republicans. It would be one party control in all elections, and that's not what we have, yet.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 2 points 9 months ago

Kinda. I mean, it is important to make the danger crystal clear. Problem is, the people with a platform to be heard from are the people who will take the opportunity to sneer at the poor people they imagine put Trump in office (it wasn't). They do the job of the fascists for them and there's no point trying to tell them; they are entirely incapable of learning anything because they are so absolutely certain that they know everything already.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, no kidding. And the fascists will Weekend At Bernie's little d all through doing the very worst of things to this country, even if he is mumbling to himself in the corner, shitting in his Depends.

If he manages to get in there, we are so screwed.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“The serious scholars of fascism are now saying that the ‘F-word’ is merited,” Jeff Sharlet, a Dartmouth professor and author of The Undertow: Scenes from a Slow Civil War, told me in an interview on Wednesday.

Sharlet suggests that media leaders bring in scholars – for example, Yale’s Timothy Snyder, who wrote On Tyranny – to lead newsroom discussions, based on clear historical precedent.

After the New York Times wrote that Trump’s New Hampshire win “raises questions” about Nikki Haley’s path forward, Sharlet scoffed, noting that such questions have been settled for some time “but a press built for the horse race keeps touting a path that never existed when it should be retooling itself to cover a rapidly mutating fascism”.

Weary of the relentless flow of bad news, the dire warnings, the anxiety, we retreat into our personal lives or our political bubbles.

More advice from Sharlet for citizens: form a “boring book club” and read – for example – Project 2025 from the Heritage Foundation, the shocking (and nearly 1,000-page) rightwing plan to dismantle the federal government and install political allies after a Trump election.

As the Associated Press wrote: “Trump-era conservatives want to gut the ‘administrative state’ from within, by ousting federal employees they believe are standing in the way of the president’s agenda and replacing them with like-minded officials more eager to fulfill a new executive’s approach to governing.”


The original article contains 799 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
291 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3687 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS