77
Trump Camacho 2024 (trumpcamacho.com)
submitted 9 months ago by Charli@lemmynsfw.com to c/politics@lemmy.world

I would laugh, except it’s not really very funny.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 37 points 9 months ago

Camacho actually tried to help the people though. And he listened to his 'expert' and fixed the problems.

Trump, the GOP, maga is so much worse than Idiocracy.

[-] superfes@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Which... is really dumb...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Exactly. Camacho listened to the smartest person in the room. Trump thinks he is the smartest person in the room.

[-] assplode@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago

Don't sully the good name of President Camacho!

He was a good man who helped his people the best way he knew how.

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

How dare you sully the name of Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho by associating him with Donald Trump.

[-] Potatofish@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I do like the campaign posters. I'd add:

Trump 2024

Found Guilty of Rape Again... Again

[-] lingh0e@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

I was confused when it came to the "sign up for more" screen and it said "NotSure@trumpcamacho.com" because I've used various versions of NotSure as emails and logins since I saw this movie. For a second I thought I had already signed up for this and forgotten about it entirely.

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago

More of the 'vote blue, no matter who' garbage.

How about instead of telling people to hold their nose and vote, you field a candidate who doesn't stink? Actually be good enough to vote for no matter who you're running against.

Trump is the best thing that happened to the dems in decades; he's lowered the bar right to the fucking ground, so they think they only have to be one inch higher, and they can use fear of the alternative to avoid being taken to task on it.

Have some actual progressive policies, and court progressive voters by actually representing their interests.

Or lose like you did in 2016, and everyone pays the price.

And no, you don't get to blame the fucking voters for getting it wrong. If you believe so hard in democrary, then you hold that the voters always get it right by definition, and anyone failing to attract their vote is simply bad at their job.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I blame Clinton and the DNC for losing 2016, but the difference this year is that we have an incumbent Democrat. He is the nominee, so it isn't just Vote Blue No Matter Who, it's Vote for Biden, literally the only viable alternative to Trump.

I wish he were a better candidate. I wish we had a progressive leader as an option. I wish there were more progressives in leadership positions at the DNC.

But those are long term goals we will acheive with dedication and voting in every election, every primary.

We cannot achieve those goals in 2024.

So when I go to the polls, I will vote for Biden. Not because he is my choice, but because he won't destroy America. And on the downticket, I will vote for progressive candidates where I can. I will not vote for a single Republican, but I can't say I will vote for every Democrat.

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago

As something of a connoisseur of abusive relationships, this pattern is familiar to me.

Yes, I spent all the money on booze and drugs. Yes, again. Yes, I should have done better. But right now, the rent is due today and the kids have no food. If you don't help out with another $900, they'll be out on the street and the kids will go into foster care. And you don't want that, do you? It's not the kids' fault, why are you punishing them? Yes, I'll try to do better going forward, I'll look at getting help, I really will. But that doesn't help me now; for now I need you to give me $900.

Next month: guess what?

While you keep rewarding bad behaviour, they'll keep exploiting you. And they know it. And you know it - you're making their argument for them. All they need to do is sit back and reel it in.

There won't be a time in the future when the impact is low enough that you can let them fail without someone getting hurt. They'll damn well make sure of that; it's a threat to their whole business model.

So you'll rescue them again and again, and as soon as your back is turned, they laugh at you for being such a schmuck.

At least, that is, until you don't. When will that be?

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

The neat part is that thanks to our system of government, we don't get to live alone and get healthy. We choose between the one who blows all our money on booze and drugs, and the one who blows all our money on booze and drugs and also beats us and the children mercilessly.

Yay democracy!

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Ok, you've convinced me. Who do we vote for, and how does that help?

[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Anyone you feel represents your position.

Could that result in a shitty outcome? Sure.

Is that your fault? Fucking no. That's the lie that has to end, and there's no non-painful way to do that.

You have to let them fail, and be loud about the fact you're doing it. There's no good time for an intervention, it's always going to be a crisis, and frankly it has to be one anyway. Daddy isn't going to bail them out this time, shit just got real.

Yes, you have to live with the consequences too; they aren't bluffing either.

[-] webadict@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

This sounds like the advice given by shitty parents.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

So you don't have a candidate to suggest? Because I don't, either.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
77 points (88.1% liked)

politics

19089 readers
2203 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS