2
submitted 2 years ago by GatoB@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago

That the 13^th^ amendment outlawed slavery.

[-] mrmanager@lemmy.today 1 points 2 years ago

That there are heroic countries in the world.

[-] animist@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

I mean define heroic, it's super subjective

[-] branchial@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

You have to completely decharge batteries before recharging them.

[-] SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

That cold water will boil faster than warm water.

It's a confusion. You should always cook with cold tap water, not hot, because hot tap water can contain excessive amounts of lead.

There are several instances where hot water can freeze faster than lukewarm water. I believe people saw this on shows such as Bill Nye and then forgot the specifics.

[-] Rhabuko@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago
[-] tubbadu@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago
[-] lightstream@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

I'm gonna guess you're a Windows user :D

[-] tubbadu@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago
[-] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

You may not be a Linux user, but everyone is a Minix user!

[-] potcandan@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

I always think about when I was taught about taste and the human tongue back in grade school, they had these diagrams about zones on the tongue corresponding to sweet, sour, bitter, etc. like a "taste map". I'm not sure how many generations were taught about it but turns out it just isn't true at all. So, not like it's important but you got a lot of misinformed folks out there in regards to taste lol

[-] Swintoodles@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

That always confused me as a child, since it was super easy to just test it for yourself. Turned out salt tasted salty regardless of where on your tongue it was, the same for the rest of the flavors.

[-] this@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

At the risk of upsetting people, most if not all religions. They can't all be right.

[-] flipcoder@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

That the first amendment and free speech are the same thing

[-] unnecessarily@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Americans: You’re not tired after eating Thanksgiving dinner because of tryptophan in the turkey, you’re tired because you ate a lot of food.

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

That trans women on hormones have a significant advantage in sports

[-] Arctichawk1@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

That people were killed in Tiananmen Square itself, that the soldiers were the first ones to kill, and that the death toll was something like 10,000. It gets played up on Reddit because of red scare propaganda and plain old chauvinism.

I wasn't going to say that at first [simply because it's a bit obnoxious] but since other people are courting drama and I was collecting links from another conversation so it's convenient to do, so I'll repost them here:

There was a great deal of violence and many students (along with other protestors, as well as the militants and soldiers) died, so I'll mark each link with an appropriate content warning, though that's mostly because the last one is rough, while the ones before it are unlikely to cause people issues.

First, here are video interviews with some of the former student leaders, the first one with Chai Ling actually being before the incident took place. There is some gunfire and yelling that a western news program uses for "ambience", but nothing is shown. Chai Ling describes a bloody scene, though that specific scene is patently fictional (this is established by the others who are interviewed).

Next is an article which discusses the subject, partly quoting student leaders above. It describes violence in broad strokes but doesn't have any pictures. It also talks about statements made by a British reporter who was there.

Third, here is secondary reporting leaked on documents from the US Embassy in Beijing and the actual report from a Latin American diplomat that was leaked. The latter revealing contains in its summary: "ALTHOUGH THEIR ACCOUNT GENERALLY FOLLOWS THOSE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED, THEIR UNIQUE EXPERIENCES PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INSIGHT AND CORROBORATION OF EVENTS IN THE SQUARE." (source text is all caps). There is very little description of violence, just mention of gunfire being present, people being wounded, etc.

{Caution} Lastly, here's an article written arguing that the event is misrepresented in mass media. I link it mainly because it includes photographic evidence that is very difficult to argue with for reasons beyond it being difficult to look at. Graphic depiction of stripped corpses of soldiers that were strung up after death.

Obviously there's more than this, but these were the links I collected recently. Chai Ling says things that are even more unhinged in footage I think they excluded from that excerpt of the interview.

[-] CoinOperatedBoi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago
[-] StoneBleach@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That looking too closely at the screen will blind you or damage your eyes. This myth originated decades ago in the 1960s from an advertisement by a television manufacturer. Basically in 1967 General Electric reported that their color TVs were emitting too many x-rays due to a factory error, so health officials recommended keeping children and pretty much anyone else at a safe distance from the screen. The problem was soon resolved, but the myth endured.

If you ask me I would say that x-ray radiation has little to do with going blind, I have no idea if radiation can actually make you blind, but it's funny how somehow eye diseases got in the way as the only possible consequences in the myth just because we use our eyes to watch TV.

[-] Ordoviz@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago
[-] Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

The government is looking out for your best interests

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

It will if everyone votes for politicians willing to do so. We get the government we vote for.

[-] slugbones@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

"Go Vote!" Rings more and more hollow every day we have watch the country crumble. I am begging you to think outside the box of electoral politics because it is where dreams go to die.

Nobody voted to put kids to work at meatpacking plants and we will almost assuredly not be allowed to vote on a solution but there are children suffering dangerous jobs right now. The capitalists that run the country do not care about your votes they care about profits and they have so many more resources than us to tip things in their favor.

Voting has not and never will be enough. It is literally the bare minimum you can do and you should not pat yourself on the back for it.

[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Bourgeois democracy, although a great historical advance in comparison with medievalism, always remains, and under capitalism is bound to remain, restricted, truncated, false and hypocritical, a paradise for the rich and a snare and deception for the exploited, for the poor.

--Lenin

[-] visnudeva@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

I came here to say that.

[-] hmn@lemmy.staphup.nl -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That ivermectin is a hazardous medicine..

It's actually donated by Merck since 1970's to African countries to fight river-blindness! The safety profile is well established and it's safe. https://mectizan.org/

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The Russiagate https://jacobin.com/2020/04/russiagate-christopher-steele-dossier-trump-election

edit: all the people being mad and downvoting just goes to underscore that once people internalize nonsense, no amount of evidence will change their minds

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43989 readers
708 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS