1
submitted 9 months ago by KevinFRK@lemmy.world to c/birding@lemmy.world

Today's lucky spotting of a Goldcrest gives me a chance to show off the pluses and minuses of Topaz AI, which I was talking about a few days ago.

We hopefully have here, from the same RAW file

  • One with Canon Digital Photo Professional 4's default efforts at de-noise and sharpening
  • One with no post-processing
  • One with Topaz AI's efforts

Topaz gives by far the prettiest results, but I do wonder if its extrapolating from other sources, and notice how the left leg has disappeared entirely.

On other shots today, Canon's DPP4 was proving better at post-processing a well lit Red Kite.

So, as before, Topaz AI is interesting, can do great things, but you need to keep an eye on it.

Canon R6 + RF600mm F11 lens, Reading, UK. 1/1000s. ISO25600, so the noise is absolutely no surprise!

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

birding

2840 readers
1 users here now

A community for people who like birds, birdwatching and birding in general!

Feel free to share your photos and other birding-related content here. If a photo you post isn't yours, please credit the original creator! Additionally, it would be appreciated if the location of the sighting and a date were given when a photo or question is posted. You do not have to give the precise location, something like "Northern Idaho, June 2023" or even "North-Western US, June 2023" suffices.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS