128
submitted 1 year ago by cyu@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.ml
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 year ago

How about we just settle this over a game of battlebots and no one else needs to get hurt.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Bro. Seriously. Guys. Listen.

Battle bots but with military budgets.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Fuck, yeah - that's certainly worth a try.

Televising shit from Adviika (?) really isn't working, currently

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Imagine BEING a military robot with super speed and senses and stuff!!

[-] clever_banana@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

No, they'd have nukes. Slash their budget by 99% then just make them do battle bots. It'll still be the best show and save lives and maybe we can also give teachers and healthcare workers decent wages and pensions too.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 11 points 1 year ago

Well yeah, may as well. The people who start wars are never risking their lives. Maybe it should be a game of battlebots between the leaders and the leader who loses dies?

[-] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 7 points 1 year ago
[-] r00ty@kbin.life 7 points 1 year ago

Later. Let's play global thermonuclear war.

[-] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Russian might still kill over a game of chess.

[-] Asudox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah but the vibrator up your ass is so uncomfortable.

[-] Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Remember, no snares or entanglement devices

[-] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 year ago

Good

Let's just make all wars robots fighting robots, and nobody has to get killed.

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 24 points 1 year ago

Never work because when your robots lose and you face another nation taking everything you own you will fight back anyway.

Otherwise we could solve international disputes with sports

[-] mihies@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

Poor robots. Let's make wars virtual instead and no robots get harmed.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Poor software. Let's make wars imaginary and no programs get harmed.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 7 points 1 year ago

Yes. Counter-strike. Best of 5. 1 map ban each. Go go go.

[-] clever_banana@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

You'd still be fighting bots then

[-] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I guess we all know what the Russians would do each round.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 4 points 1 year ago

RUSH B CYKA!!!!!!111111

[-] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

That was in the Age of Chivalry when everything was honoured on the battlefield.

[-] clever_banana@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago

What misinformation have you been fed?

[-] cheeseburger@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

them robots took our jorbs!

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Can we make it so that only robots fight robots? Straight up battle bots, Supreme Commander style action instead so that people aren't dying.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

hooray…the future…

[-] clever_banana@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago

Great news! Does this mean they can remove all the humans from the war zone now?

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Also, can we move the war online?

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

for the sake of tradition I think the outcome should be decided by a 1v1 classic tetris duel

[-] emmie@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ugh I hate all these subscription paywalls nowadays. Internet is so far from the initial ideals

It’s pennies but if I had to track every subscription and there would be hundred... It should be covered at ISP somehow as optional news network^tm^

[-] utopiah@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Check your ISP might actually provide such packages. You might even already be benefiting from it but never used it.

I'd prefer if WebMonetization would be more broadly adopted so that all participants in the chain get their share, even if pennies indeed it still would be right and does add up.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Essentially robots will become the front line and will front the attrition war. Once enemy robots tear through friendly robots they'll go after any other friendly units, including human ones.

Robots can't tell soldiers from civilians, so they'll act as area denial. You have five minutes to move a hundred meters back to a safe space after which robots will kill anything on this side of the red line. Lather, rinse, repeat until there's no safe space left.

Video of this would embarrass the international community, so for now we'll have to garrison civilian centers with human beings, which is still messy. When we have robots that can garrison, then all-robot armies will become viable.

[-] prashanthvsdvn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Wtf, why does this sound like precursor to premise of 86

[-] jojo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

This sounds like the beginning of Ultrakill

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
128 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

38979 readers
55 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS