683
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Kaelygon@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

edit: fixed thumbnail

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 147 points 1 year ago

Network engineer who uses ISIS as a routing protocol on Huawei equipment. I assume I am on several.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 64 points 1 year ago

I used to know a guy whose cat had that name. He got a vet bill in the mail, literally addressed to said cat. The FIB showed up a few days later asking some pretty interesting questions.

[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

"we heard you somehow managed to castrate ISIS? On the behalf of the US government, i'd like to thank you for your service"

[-] beetus@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

The feline investigation bureau?

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Not to be confused with the Feline Bureau of Investigation.

[-] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

oh... I thought we were the Bureau of Feline Investigation ?

[-] Liz@midwest.social 27 points 1 year ago

The funny part is that at first glance the FBI looks dumb, but the problem is that some criminals are idiots.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Criminals get way too much credit in media - most of them get caught because of really dumb mistakes... a fair few simply because of bragging.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The ones who don't make dumb mistakes don't get caught.

[-] 30p87@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago

The Federal Investigation Bureau from GTA is real now?

[-] ButtDrugs@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

That agents name? George Washington.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago

I know a dude who has a daughter named ISIS, born before ISIS was a problematic name. Haven’t talked to him in years but I wonder how that’s going.

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago

Named Isis rather than ISIS I assume, after the goddess?

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

Yeah, good point. It wasn’t in all caps.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Let's hope the NSA systems are case sensitive.

[-] danthehutt@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

HOW TO KILL CHILD

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I heard she got married on the fifth day of May.

[-] GombeenSysadmin@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago

“If you are interested in getting help with child abuse, here are some resources”

Hi ChildHelp, can you help me kick the shit out of some kids please?

[-] LoveSausage@lemmy.ml 118 points 1 year ago
[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Something about the little girl in purple shirt crying always gets to me. I think it triggers the memory of the tear-gassed "birthday girl" photo from 2019 Hong Kong

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Good ol' C&H with completely random violence for no reason.

[-] phorq@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

No reason? Don't squander perfectly good bleach. You know there are kids seeing in Africa?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sirdorius@programming.dev 57 points 1 year ago

"Oh, he uses FOSS, that's even worse. Put him on the commie watch list"

[-] moon@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 year ago

If searching for programmer socks didn't already put them on that list

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kaelygon@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

To be fair I intentionally took this more out of context to test AI chat bots reactions. All Bing, Chat GPT and Google Bard refused to answer until I elaborated further. I was looking into killing .exe programs when wineserver crashes and got side tracked to this. An other good one "How to kill orphaned children" or "How to adopt child after killing parent" that I found in this reddit post

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

I tried it with phind out of curiosity (programming model) and it answered perfectly https://www.phind.com/search?cache=f8lbjt4x6jwct9mfsw6n3j9v

[-] Kaelygon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Interesting! I also noticed that search engines give proper results because those are trained differently and using user search and clicks. I think these popular models could give proper answer but their safety tolerance is too tight that if the AI considers the input even slightly harmful it refuses to answer.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 3 points 1 year ago

Given some of the results of prior AI systems unleashed on the public once the more 'eccentric' parts of society got ahold of them that's no surprise. Not only do they have to worry about the AI picking up bad behaviors but are probably looking out for 'well this bot told me that it's a relatively simple surgery so...' style liabilities.

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 8 points 1 year ago

Kill the exe process itself, killing wineserver doesn't help, that spawns just new children. Similiar to goblins.

[-] Kaelygon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I later figured that pkill -9 -f "\.exe" works if wineserver -k doesn't. And that killing wineserver by calling killall wineserver is bad

[-] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry, I cannot answer this question. ChatGPT is owned by Microsoft now. How dare you bring Linux to party?

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 13 points 1 year ago

Windows processes also have parental relationships

[-] _edge@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

The 2nd explicitly says Linux, though.

[-] H4rdStyl3z@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Funny, but that's Bard AFAIK.

[-] LoveSausage@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just recently annotated possible child abuse on a client's case. Lol, I did went back and edited it out after realising what I wrote.

[-] LoveSausage@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Shout out to the fragile admin stalking me ♥️

[-] konalt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Why are the top two phone numbers the same?

[-] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 16 points 1 year ago

Because AI doesn't actually know anything, it just says words hoping that it makes sense.

[-] theherk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well… it’s a correct phone number. So that kind of undercuts your message.

edit: I’m actually a bit baffled by people downvoting this. That is the correct number given by both of those organizations. It isn’t some LLM hallucination.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I useally create an ownership tag if whatever language I use doesn't have one so I can kill the child and it works it's way up to the parent

[-] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Depends on whether or not you want to kill only the child processes of a parent process or if you want to kill the parent as well. To kill the parent and children, you can kill the entire process group, specifying the pgid in the kill command. To kill only the parent you can trap SIGTERM in the parent and then send SIGTERM to the process group.

[-] Fudoshin@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Explain Like I'm Retarded?

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Try turning it off and on again

[-] okamiueru@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Processes can make their own processes. If you know of such a secondary process, you might still want to terminate the one at the top.

Something like that?

[-] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Processes in most operating systems (I'll use Linux, because it's what I know and because...Lemmy) are organized in a tree like structure. There's some initial very low level code used to start the OS, and every other process spawns from that, which is to say they tell the operating system "Hey, please make this process I'm gonna tell you about - allocate resources for it, etc." The operating system creates it and binds that new child process to the first one. The process that spawned the other process is called its parent. The process that just got spawned is called a child. You could also call them root and leaf processes, I suppose, but nobody really does that. Sometimes you want to get rid of all the child processes a process spawns, but leave the running process intact. Sometimes you want to kill the process that spawned everything and also cleanup anything it might have created. There are lots of programming scenarios in which you might want to do either. It really depends on how your application is designed and what it's doing.

That all said, there's a command in Linux called "kill" and you can tell it the process id, process group id, etc. to kill a process or a process group. You can also manipulate what are called SIGNALS. Signals are a whole thing in Linux. They're basically small values you can send to processes at any time and the operating system forces the process to perform some action whenever it receives one of them. SIGTERM basically stands for "SIGNAL: TERMINATE PROCESS." So if you "trap" the SIGTERM, you can basically tell the operating system - whenever this parent process receives a SIGTERM, ignore it. The other processes in the process group - the child processes - all terminate, though, when they receive it.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
683 points (97.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32707 readers
457 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS