171
submitted 9 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 9 months ago

I don't think a poll is necessary to know that people are eager for corporations and the wealthy to actually face consequences for their actions. Privatizing profit and socializing loss is kill us.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 9 months ago

It can have value in that politicians often hear what the rich and powerful have to say, and can end up confusing this with what the public wants

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago
[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Bold of you to assume many politicians care what the people think in the first place

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago

Not all do, but enough often do that it affects policy.

[-] Masterblaster@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

so what do we do about it?

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

Based on what I've seen since the Regan administration: we get killed. And they'll expect us to thank them for it.

[-] Masterblaster@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

maybe we should change our strategy not getting killed.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Look up your legislators, give their office a call, and encourage them to act.

Organize with others, so that you're able to deliver votes and/or campaign contributions at scale in exchange for helping to get off of fossil fuels.

[-] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

This shit doesnt work. Fines get added to cost of business and passed off to consumers.

The law needs to change to stop considering corps as people, and go after the actual stakeholders fucking over the country for extra profit.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 9 months ago

There's a fair bit of evidence to that they do work, by creating a financial incentive to shift away from fossil fuels.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I bet there is also wide support for public mulching the C-Suite of corporate polluters.

I bet that would also be more effective.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

At this point the reasonable position should be to toss fossil fuel executives into a volcano.

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
171 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2164 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS