32
submitted 2 years ago by botlt_test@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Omfg

The EU is good for something.

Tho it's still a shame that it's not the customers demand that is making this happen.

Mandatary memory card support and physical SIM forever next.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Why did manufacturers take these features away???

[-] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

So they can sell you another phone sooner.

[-] slipperydippery@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Do security updates for a minimum of 5 years next

[-] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Or just open source the drivers and we'll have all the updates forever.

[-] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Back to the good old times! :)

[-] arandomthought@vlemmy.net 1 points 2 years ago

With how capable modern mobile CPUs are phones could really last a long time without feeling "so last generation" very fast. So the battery really often is the bottleneck and not having it be replaceable would really just be planned obsolescence with extra steps. It's good to hear some good news once in a while.

[-] zczgws@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Apple's gonna def overcharge for the replacements

[-] TigerClawTV@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Good! Bring back keyboards too!

[-] GaryPonderosa@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Headline from 2028: Why You phone Dies When It Gets Wet

[-] original_reader@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

They had waterproof smartphones before this idiocy of non-replacable batteries. Ten years ago!

Just some examples:

Sony Xperia Active (2011)

Samsung Galaxy S5 (2014)

Today's smartphones are built cheap. Sadly. Louis Rossmam explains this well.

[-] GaryPonderosa@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Waterproofing was more difficult with replaceable batteries. It was a feature you paid extra for.

[-] 2ZR_FXE@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Was it?

So many years have passed since that phone came out.

Manufacturers had more than enough time to do something right besides just being water resistant.

[-] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But there was phones from 2010s with removable batteries and water protection.

And sony have some water resistant phones with removable batteries now

[-] GaryPonderosa@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's more expensive to waterproof a phone with a removable battery. Yes, there were phones from the 2010s that were waterproof and had removable batteries, but that was a feature you had to pay extra for.

[-] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de -1 points 2 years ago

And phones are currently the most expensive they've ever been, even adjusted to inflation. Waterproofing with replacable batteries would barely dent the price, especially after a few years.

[-] GaryPonderosa@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I highly doubt that they're the most expensive they've ever been. iPhones and flagship phones may well be because the companies that make them know the morons that buy them will pay $1000 for a status symbol, but you can purchase new smartphones for under $200. Considering the original iPhone cost triple that, your claim seems ludicrous.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)

World News

47867 readers
748 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS