320
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 48 points 10 months ago

Journalist outlets everywhere are doing it, not just CNN...

BNN Bloomberg and Canadian news outlets CTV, CP24 were forbidden from using the word Palestine and heavily restricted coverage including banning reporting on calls for a ceasefire.

I think that's why it's important on various unions, US and Canadian cities, and other groups to call for a ceasefire, that way the press will be less and less able to ignore it or censor it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

What? How do you even discuss the situation without using the word 'Palestine?'

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 9 months ago

Oops, everything is Hamas now!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] S_204@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

They use Gaza instead.

The thinking behind this is that you're not making it out like it's all Palestinians that are part of the Hamas death cult...at least that's how it's been explained to me. Not sure how that's pro Israel exactly, seems to be more pro Palestinian but I'm sure someone will tell me how that's wrong.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I said this to @MxM111- my problem is that the IDF is now doing raids in the West Bank too. When the IDF is in both parts of Palestine, using Gaza doesn't really make sense.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] spider@lemmy.nz 5 points 9 months ago

Journalist outlets everywhere are doing it, not just CNN…

It's happening on multiple fronts:

Pro-Israel groups target US lawmakers critical of Gaza war with attack ads

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago

I personally know people who lived under Israel's illegal occupation of Lebanon. If America knew even HALF of the shit they get up to, we would demand all funding be cut off immediately.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

They still wouldn’t care. Just look at the police as an example.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 22 points 9 months ago

Lol, what? Our government has always been pro-genocide.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

The government, yes, the American citizens, not so much.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

Been making the demands of my reps since October to cut funding, but funnily enough they aren’t exactly receptive to those who aren’t military contractor lobbyists. Go figure.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

There's reports from IDF veterans that amount to eyewitness accounts of war crimes over the years. According to them the IDF does those things routinely. The example I remember off the top of my head is searching random Palestinian houses in the West Bank and of course any resistance is dealt with harshly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

Why the hell does anyone watch CNN anymore? They have a right wing slant but Republicans think it's so far left it's practically communist.

So who is watching it?

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Every Boomer I have ever known has had a TV with a news station on just running in the background of their lives at home.

You go into their home, the TV is always on. They aren't necessarily watching it but they have that shit rolling 24 hours a day.

As of 2021, roughly 56% of US citizens still have a Cable TV subscription. Those numbers continue to drop, but plenty of Boomers still have that TV on and running all damn day long.

CNN's actual viewership numbers are abysmal compared to FOX News and MSNBC.

https://deadline.com/2023/12/cable-news-ratings-2023-1235682966/

CNN posted 582,000, down 19%

Ouch, in a country of 350 million people, CNN can barely pull half a million people who give a shit about their broadcast.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Ouch, in a country of 350 million people, CNN can barely pull half a million people who give a shit about their broadcast.

I don't have cable so I don't know... who the fuck is willing to advertise to a national audience that small? You could spend less money and have more reach on a radio station in one city.

[-] rem26_art@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

man my parents constantly have CNN on in the background and i have no idea how they havent gone completely crazy hearing whatever the pundits are talking about all day. Not to mention the same like, 3 ads over and over again

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Fades@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

fucking IRONIC that these CNN staffers suddenly have a conscience and care about 'journalistic malpractice', but they have had no such issues with normalizing trump's dangerous fascism and go out of their way to ensure he is given a platform.

fuck pro-israel/pro-genocide narratives, but fuck these piece of shit enablers right along with em.

REAL JOURNALISM IS DEAD at these big media outlets. They are beholden to the elite, not the truth.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

CNN is home to some of the most egregious journalistic malpractice. Being pro-Israel is expected.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

Actually it's called aiding and abetting genocide.

I'm so furious at the press in my country for obfuscating the genocide and the ICJ ruling. And even more at my fucking government for aiding in the genocide directly by cutting funding to UN humanitarian aid. FUCKING FUCKERS

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Western "journalism" has reached a new low. Social media is a blessing. Even The Guardian can't just write unbiased news.

I can't read one article without having "Hamas bloody super duper massacre with pregnant women cut open in ovens" thrown in my face, when 200 children just casually die from an explosion in Gaza on the 5th page.

It's such a sad state of affairs that opening Aljazeera feels more factual than any western newspaper.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

Just learned this recently after picking up on a larger than usual bias coming from CNN and subsequently did some deep research to learn what this article mentions, that they're filtering the news through Israel.

I did not know, however, that the CEO was put into that position of power at CNN (one of the less crazy cable news networks that has a wide audience) just when it would be beneficial to Israel. That seems... convenient timing? It could just as equally have been a coincidence, but, weird nonetheless.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

just when it would be beneficial to Israel

On 30 August 2023, Thompson was named the CEO of CNN

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/06/07/chris-licht-out-cnn-column-00100824

Licht (previous CEO) “lost” the newsroom, as people like to put it when the newsroom rebels against a new boss. A similar thing happened to Howell Raines, who was essentially ousted as executive editor of the New York Times by the newsroom in 2003 after 21 months at the top after proving charm deficient. Employees tend to resist new bosses unless given a reason to embrace them. Raines, and now Licht, provided no such reason, and suffered for it. Journalists love to complain, and they love to leak on their bosses when peeved. “Top talent began to turn on Licht,” as Alberta put it. The CNN newsroom’s dissatisfaction with Licht was already a media beat staple before the Atlantic story, which made CNN management and not the network itself the story. A bad look.

Also, let's not pretend that CNN was fine until Israel's need for control over American narratives. Case in point: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/sep/10/objective-cnn-rightwing-week-in-patriarchy

Licht was trash and it spurred a lot of distrust and dislike among CNN users over the pandering to conservatives and the wannabe mango Mussolini

Sat 10 Sep 2022 09.00 EDT CNN wants to be the new Fox News and it’s not even trying to hide it. Earlier this year Chris Licht became the new CEO of the cable network and immediately made it clear that he was going to change the network’s direction. One of Licht’s first moves was to embark on what Axios described as a “Capitol Hill diplomacy tour” and others described as a Republican boot-licking tour. Licht met with lawmakers who had become wary of cable news and promised them that CNN was moving away from “alarmist” programming towards more neutral, objective reporting.

What does that mean in practice? Well, it appears to mean firing anyone who is critical of Donald Trump or Republicans. Last month CNN suddenly axed Brian Stelter’s Sunday show in a move many commentators considered politically motivated; Stelter had been an outspoken critic of Trump and was reviled by many on the right. Earlier this month White House correspondent John Harwood was fired shortly after calling Trump “a dishonest demagogue” on the air.

It’s not just who was fired that is alarming – it’s the abrupt manner in which they were fired. As the media analyst Josh Marshall noted, “The most striking thing about Licht’s firings to date is how they are choreographed for … right-wing media consumption and designed to generate mass schadenfreude on the right: the bête noires Fox has been harping on for years suddenly marched to the top of the pyramid and hurled to the ground.” Licht says he’s moving away from sensational news, but he appears to be putting on his own little drama for the right.

After purging progressive voices, Licht has just made his first big hire: announcing on Tuesday that John Miller would be joining CNN as the network’s chief law enforcement and intelligence analyst. Miller isn’t exactly an obvious hire if you’re looking to brandish your new “neutrality” credentials. The former New York police department (NYPD) deputy commissioner of intelligence and counter-terrorism is an extremely polarizing figure who made headlines in March when he testified to the New York city council that the NYPD did not, in his opinion, inappropriately spy on Muslims after the September 11 attacks. Which is a weird thing to say because Pulitzer Prize-winning reporting has clearly shown that the NYPD used census data to spy on Muslims following September 11 and the department has settled a number of lawsuits related to the illegal spying.

... article continues

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Minotaur@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

This is a shockingly big issue that impacts a lot of things outside of even mainstream journalism.

For instance: I’m a Wikipedia editor in my spare time. I enjoy editing Wikipedia. However, one caveat of the “notability” standard in Wikipedia is that a given page has to have a particular amount of references to it from “notable sources” (often, academic sources and big news agencies).

Unfortunately - what this means is that Wikipedia has a huge lean towards topics that essentially only pertain to areas where a lot of journalism is centered, which is often NYC and parts of the West Coast. Entire rural regions or countries will have major events ‘not qualify’ for a Wikipedia page due to the lack of “notable” references - while what are essentially inside jokes by New Yorker yuppie types will have entire pages published.

There’s just a big problem with representative coverage in media and unfortunately groups like Palestinians and Muslims are severely underrepresented

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
320 points (94.7% liked)

News

23424 readers
1521 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS