722
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sebinspace@lemmy.world 558 points 10 months ago

Alright you’ve been on a roll lately Swifty, but imma call you out; transponders are public information.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 149 points 10 months ago

Yeah, she's generally a decent person, but she's just in the wrong here.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 185 points 10 months ago

She's generally good at managing her public persona, except when it comes to her ~~pollute more than a small city machine~~ private jet addiction. When people show you who they really are, believe them.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 165 points 10 months ago

She also showed who she really was during the SAG-AFTRA and WGA strikes: someone who agrees to union demands, which was why she was allowed to release the best-selling concert movie of all time during the middle of the strikes.

On top of that, she got thousands of her fans registered to vote.

People are complicated.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago

I like that she singlehandedly proved the union demands were reasonable.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zweibel@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago

"People are complicated."

Very much agree with this sentiment. I feel, too often, this gets lost in discussions. People will do stuff we agree with, and then they'll turn around and do something we disagree with. It's fine to praise and simultaneously lambast 'em.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 257 points 10 months ago

If you are for Musk being tracked, you should be fine with her being tracked the same way.

I'm for anyone in a private jet being tracked.

[-] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago

I'm for no one having a private jet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] derf82@lemmy.world 239 points 10 months ago

Woman who made over a billion being a public figure upset she is now a public figure.

Sorry, no privacy for private jets. I don’t care about the “danger.” She can fly commercial in business class or first class if she wants privacy.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 51 points 10 months ago

Her Grammy speech was literally "I love doing this, thank you for giving me the opportunity to do what I love."

Bitch, if you don't want people to track you then fly first class.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 220 points 10 months ago

I'm on team Florida student.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 72 points 10 months ago

Same.

Track them all. Elon. Other Billionaires. Government using our taxes for private planes.

[-] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 180 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Didn't the richest person in the world try to do this exact same thing? I'm still convinced it's the reason he bought Twitter. Those flight logs are public information because they prevent mid air collisions, your not going to change that. No one is going to be putting military grade radar equipment on a Boeing 757 if they can't even stop the doors from opening mid flight.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 163 points 10 months ago

Those flight logs are public information because they prevent mid air collisions, your not going to change that.

One way to prevent being personally identified is to not fly around in your own personal jet and use one of the many other available options that aren't trackable this way.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] iluminae@lemmy.world 175 points 10 months ago

But flight data is available - this guy just labels her N number and filters the data in a creepy way. I get that it's probably causing her danger to have stalkers waiting at the destination for her - but those stalkers always had access to this flight data.

Seems like a workaround for Taylor would be to not own a plane and charter a different one every time. (Or do something actually environmentally minded :/)

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 70 points 10 months ago

How is it creepy? It’s activism.

This person is a hell of a lot more useful to the world than some billionaire piece of shit.

[-] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

Just because it's done to a woman it's suddenly "creepy". Don't think anyone ever called that guy creepy when it was done to Elon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 142 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The solution is obvious.

Stop owning private jets.

Billionaires threatening, harassing, and intimidating normal people with their army of lawyers and sycophant fans is never okay.

Fuck Taylor Swift and every other rich piece of shit.

[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 124 points 10 months ago

Fuck billionaires

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 109 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Her lawyers must be crazy to think they can get anything done that elon couldn't. Taylor should be mad at her PR for not stopping her if she asked for this personally.

As for private jets. People with wealth, use that wealth to find an alternative. God knows you haven't found anything else to do with it.

Edit: Also, please let it be zeppelin technology.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 107 points 10 months ago

nope. sorry taylor. if your plane's tracking information is public knowledge it's allowed. if it's good for elon it's good for you too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 106 points 10 months ago

Way to kill the goodwill you've been gaining Taylor

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 94 points 10 months ago

I'm thinking since the super bowl drama she's probably getting more death threats than usual, and this is a reaction to that. It's not going to work. You cant sue someone for publishing publicly available information.

[-] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 56 points 10 months ago

You can sue someone for anything. If it will be successful or not is another matter.

Essentially she is trying to SLAPP him (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation). Lawyers are not free in civil cases. She is just making it expensive for him if he wants to defend himself. And i doubt Florida has an anti-slapp law.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] UmeU@lemmy.world 90 points 10 months ago

If you travel in the same plane all the time, and you own that plane, people will be able to track you. Why not just get a good contract with a private jet company so you can fly anonymously? Even if she wins this case, she will still be trackable until she takes advantage of any of the options she has at her disposal.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 88 points 10 months ago

Maybe not the best idea to pattern yourself after Musk.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 82 points 10 months ago

Put simply, there are no "good billionaires".

load more comments (41 replies)
[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 72 points 10 months ago

It’s public information. If you have a problem then stop flying around in your fancy fucking jet.

God damn rich people. Fuck em all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Looks like someone doesn't know how transponders work.

Understandable I guess: It's not really something most people know anything about, but you'd think someone working for her would've been like, "Yeah, no, that's not really how aviation works, they are public by design" before it got to the point where a legal threat was made.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] trackindakraken@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 60 points 10 months ago

I'm expecting her to be revealed as a villain at some point. She was born with a silver spoon, there are skeletons in closets, and she knows it. Time will tell.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 60 points 10 months ago

What a friendly billionaire.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 57 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

ADS-B data is public. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy. I grew to respect her recently, but in this matter, she is full of shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 47 points 10 months ago

Sure Ms. Swift, act like Muskrat.

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 10 months ago

If you don't want people to know where your going just throw on a medical mask and buy a Greyhound ticket in cash like every other undercover federal agent

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sirspate@lemmy.ca 45 points 10 months ago

Looking forward to her new, highly-relatable single, "Why you gotta track my jet?"

[-] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago
[-] dog_@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] atyaz@reddthat.com 38 points 10 months ago

If she had simply not said anything, no one would be talking about it

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
722 points (96.0% liked)

News

23655 readers
2921 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS