107
submitted 9 months ago by ira@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world

The cages are getting smaller and more abusive.

The United States government has placed detained immigrants in solitary confinement more than 14,000 times in the last five years, and the average duration is almost twice the 15-day threshold that the United Nations has said may constitute torture, according to a new analysis of federal records by researchers at Harvard and the nonprofit group Physicians for Human Rights.

The report, based on government records from 2018 through 2023 and interviews with several dozen former detainees, noted cases of extreme physical, verbal and sexual abuse for immigrants held in solitary cells.

Overall, Immigration and Customs Enforcement is detaining more than 38,000 people -- up from about 15,000 at the start of the Biden administration in January 2021

Solitary confinement placements in the third quarter of 2023 were 61 percent higher than in the third quarter of the previous year, according to ICE's quarterly reports.

More than 680 cases of isolation lasted at least three months, the records show; 42 of them lasted more than one year.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Hi! Welcome to America! As part of your welcome package we've arranged some light "torture" with heapings of verbal, physical and sexual abuse. Enjoy!

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

oh and we lost your kids lol

[-] anonymouse@lemmings.world 6 points 9 months ago

So in November I have to choose between human rights abuses or human rights abuses plus rising fascism. Fucking hell.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The report, based on government records from 2018 through 2023 and interviews with several dozen former detainees, noted cases of extreme physical, verbal and sexual abuse for immigrants held in solitary cells.

The researchers’ work began more than six years ago when faculty members at the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program started requesting documents from the Department of Homeland Security through the Freedom of Information Act.

Among the documents were copies of emails and monitoring reports exchanged between ICE headquarters officials and records of facility inspections by independent groups and the Homeland Security inspector general.

While civil custody is not intended to be punitive, government records show the use of solitary confinement as a punishment for petty offenses or as retaliation for bringing issues to light, such as submitting complaints or participating in hunger strikes.

An asylum seeker from central Africa who spent three years in ICE custody, including a month in solitary confinement in Mississippi, said that one of the most intense methods of psychological abuse was forcing the immigrants to constantly wonder how long their isolation would last.

“It’s pretty widely understood the severe consequences of putting vulnerable populations in solitary confinement,” said Sabrineh Ardalan, the director of the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program, who contributed to the analysis.


The original article contains 1,737 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 88%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The dark ages never ended

[-] butt_mountain_69420@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

If only there were some way to enter the country legally so you don't end up in federal custody.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

in many cases, they are. don't support this crap

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

The legal way to enter the US is to immediately present themselves to Federal custody so that they can start the process of claiming asylum. That's how this works.

The vast majority of migrants follow this simple procedure.

Step A; set foot on US soil via any means.

Step 2; locate the nearest border patrol agent and hope they aren't feeling abusive and or murderous.

Step #; claim asylum.

That's it. That's the legal process.

Now, one a migrant has claimed asylum, that doesn't mean that they get to stay. No, that starts the investigation and Asylum Hearings.

Conservatives absolutely hate brown people coming to the country, so have massively cut funding for investigations and hearings. This means that migrants seeking asylum end up sitting in federal custody (that they willingly turned themselves into) for months, or even years.

Meanwhile, the number one source of "illegal" immigration is, and always has been, visa overstays. Someone will get a visa to visit the US, and then just not go home when it ends.


Fun fact, the people who cross the border without then claiming asylum? They're instantly deported.

It's only the desperate who claim asylum, and often because their lives are so bad in their home country that taking the risk of dying on the way to the US border is the better choice. It's often so bad in their home country because of US intervention over the years... We've done more evil in the name of making some rich asshole slightly richer than any other country, save England and the Dutch.

The CIA literally sent agents to South America to teach dictators how to more brutally torture newspaper publishers and elementary school teachers. And people were tortured.

The scars of that sort of shit, both figurative and literal, are part of those countries, even after the right wing dictators were ousted from power.

We owe these people, and yet racist jackasses keep cheering when we abuse them even more, claiming they deserve it for coming here illegally. They've followed procedure, and we've fucked them over yet again.

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
107 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19135 readers
1169 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS