512
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The Houston Democrat is recovering from abdominal surgery. Democrats did not expect him to attend the vote, but his surprise appearance sank the impeachment vote.

All of Texas’ House Republicans voted to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for failing to secure the southern border, but the House fell short of passing the historic resolution on Tuesday after Rep. Al Green, D-Houston, rushed to the House from the hospital where he was recovering from abdominal surgery to vote no.

The impeachment failed on a 216-214 vote. Four Republicans joined all Democrats in voting against the impeachment. The House has not impeached a member of a president’s cabinet in nearly 150 years.

The vote was extremely close, with the outcome unknown until the end of the vote. U.S. Rep. Mike Gallagher, a Wisconsin Republican who chairs the House select committee on China, voted against the resolution. Numerous Republicans, including Texan Reps. Michael McCaul and Jodey Arrington were seen circling around Gallagher as he held out on his vote.

U.S. Reps. Ken Buck of Colorado and Tom McClintock of California also voted against impeachment. U.S. Rep. Blake Moore, R-Utah, ended up changing his vote to a no at the last minute, tanking the vote but allowing Republicans to bring it up again in the future.

House Republicans were counting on Green to be absent. But he arrived just in time in a wheelchair and scrubs to give Democrats enough votes to kill the impeachment.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 125 points 10 months ago

What kind of a dumb system do we have where everybody has to be physically present on the floor to be able to put in a vote? They can’t just do a conference call to find out how a Rep would vote and get it recorded?

[-] themadcodger@kbin.social 102 points 10 months ago

Because our whole government operates as if this still the 1800s and the only thing holding us together is the Pony Express.

[-] PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 10 months ago

Pony Express

Which was a commercial failure, if anyone is curious. The whole shebang lasted less than two years. Started in 1860, bankrupt in 1861, thanks to the telegraph's stretch across America.

[-] Soulg@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It probably would have been incredible if it came earlier

[-] Infinity187@lemm.ee 61 points 10 months ago

Because Steve Scalise and Co. were able to do away with proxy voting some years ago. The kicker is his goulish ass was also in the hospital and couldn't vote. GOP are fucking idiots.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 40 points 10 months ago

And the Republicans lost the vote because they were counting on him not being there, which means they were gaming this dumb system to try to pass something that wouldn't have passed were all Representatives allowed to vote.

[-] Talaraine@kbin.social 29 points 10 months ago

At the same time who cares more about their job, this guy or the guy who ran off to Cancun xD

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 74 points 10 months ago

What a fucking joke. Seems pretty clear that one of their goals is to completely remove any meaning from the word "impeach," so Trump's tenure doesn't look as bad.

Really great priorities.

[-] Fudoshin@feddit.uk 14 points 10 months ago

Were you around for Clinton? He got impeached for getting his knob sucked.

I don't think Republicans have ever used it seriously.

[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Technically he got impeached for perjury. Pretty mild compared to Trump's impeachments.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Still will never understand it though. Clinton got a blowy and Republicans lost their minds. Trump fucked a hooker and nobody batted an eye

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah but anyone who knows about that time will tell you that it's much different and far worse now.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

And they will still lie to their voters and blame everything on the Democrats.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Greene already did that. She blamed Democrats on doing something Republicans didn't expect for them losing, but in an indignant "how dare they" tone.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 4 points 10 months ago

Did anyone reasonable think they actually want/intend to govern?

[-] phx@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

Meh, impeach is weak for Trump anyhow. Insurrection and possibly treason seem more in-line with his actions.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 73 points 10 months ago

I wish we could see video or images of this bad-ass Democrat in hospital scrubs charging in on a wheelchair to vote.

[-] youngGoku@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Scrubs are a political stunt.... If he can travel from Texas to DC he can change his clothes.

[-] Tilgare@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Are you joking? Do you think that representatives and senators commute daily from their home towns to Washington DC?

[-] youngGoku@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

This was before morning coffee lol... I can be dense at times.

[-] Tilgare@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Fair enough. 😊

[-] ferralcat 66 points 10 months ago

It's 2024 and congress still wants people to come in to the office to raise their hand.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

But not when they want to kill a bill in the Senate, they can filibuster without ever even coming into the chamber.

[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Gotta keep those big oil hands well oiled.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

During the Pandemic, Democrats approved rules allowing proxy voting. Of course, that was one of the first things Kevin (Remember him?) got rid of.

Ha Ha

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 40 points 10 months ago

Al Green has balls of steel. Truly bad-ass, based.

[-] loopedcandle@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 10 months ago

Plus I love Let's stay together

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Since we're talking about that Al Green, have you ever heard his cover of "Light My Fire?" I don't even like The Doors and I still love it (probably because it's almost a different song).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0zAnoNZlmY

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago
[-] HorreC@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

Why would he have been in scrubs? He doesn't work at the hospital, they don't just hand those out to the patients.

[-] downhomechunk@midwest.social 44 points 10 months ago

Well, maybe they meant hospital gown? Or they gave him scrubs so his balls would not have amy chance to see daylight? Or maybe it was a stunt to get attention.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago

Idk if it's different in the US but when I went to a hospital in Canada for a broken leg they gave me scrubs and even let me keep the pants cause they were so comfy.

[-] HorreC@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

I cant speak to all of the states, but when I had leg issues as well, I was doing my therapy walking down the hall in a hospital gown.

[-] Buck@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I can't speak to all hospitals, but I once came in to drop off flowers and they put scrubs on me and gave me two extra sets to use at home, as well as a boxset of the first season of Scrubs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I imagine he didn't want to leave the hospital in an open-back hospital gown. So they gave him scrubs.

Why are people even focusing on this? Who fucking cares if he was wearing scrubs??

[-] HorreC@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Its not normal, you have your own clothes there, or you have staff to bring it. Why is this ok to gloss over?

[-] plantedworld@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

The hospital will have spare scrubs on hand, either for surgery or for staff to change if theirs get contaminated. Or, the patient pants are vaguely scrub like.

I'd guess they let him use some.

[-] nonfuinoncuro@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Occasionally for trauma victims or homeless people we give them scrubs to leave the hospital with if they don't have their own clothes or if they want pants to walk around the hospital with (normal gowns notoriously show off your butt as the flaps are in the back)

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

out to the patients.

He had abdominal surgery. I'm guessing you stay there for a bit until everything checks out.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago

Scrubs are the things doctors and nurses wear, not patient garb.

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

A scrub is a guy that thinks he's fly, also known as a buster.

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

In my experience they sometimes give scrubs to patients for various reasons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Kinda badass though.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Numerous Republicans, including Texan Reps. Michael McCaul and Jodey Arrington were seen circling around Gallagher as he held out on his vote.

U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who launched Tuesday's impeachment effort, said Democrats had plotted to make Republicans miscount the number of votes they needed.

The vote to oust Mayorkas is the latest GOP effort to attack the Biden administration over the border crisis, as illegal crossings have reached record highs.

Impeachment is historically used as an extraordinary measure but has become a common rallying cry among Republicans against Democratic targets, including Mayorkas and President Joe Biden.

U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-San Antonio, said the impeachment vote was a distraction from the House Republican Conference’s inability to pass legislation into law since taking the majority.

“When you have no record of accomplishment to run on, nothing on education, nothing on health care, nothing about creating jobs, nothing on the environment, nothing about keeping people safe, this is what you do.


The original article contains 890 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Yewb@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Well I can no longer read Al as AL its ai always A.I. now

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago

Fonts need to clearly differentiate a lowercase L from an uppercase i. It's so frustrating I don't understand why this bad fonts are so widespread

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I don't know either. For some reason we fell in love with Sans-Serif (e.g. Arial) for internet stuff. I'm guessing it's because they look less "old fashioned" than that "newspaper-looking stuff." Personally, I find serif fonts more readable, and they would distinguish "l" from "I".

[-] PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 10 months ago

Same here. We've got some neat studies showing that serif fonts are read more quickly, which I would think is a big boon.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
512 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19240 readers
1661 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS