"HEXBEAR IS THE 4CHAN OF THE LEFT!" [CW: mentions of suicide] (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

NSFW 127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"So, you mean they're homophobic?"

"Well, no, but-"

"So they're misogynistic? Racist? Transphobic? Ableist???"

"N-no, actually they enforce strict banning on all those things, BUT-"

"So they bully people into suicide?"

"Nooo, they require content warnings for even mentions of suicide, BUT!"

"...Yes?"

"I saw one of them say 'death to nazis!"

"So they're the opposite of 4Chan?"

"NO!"

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

hey dirt since this is a CW post can you nsfw tag it? thanks bae cat-trans

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure thing rat-salute-2 Done.

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

rosa-salute

[-] Enver_McTim@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ngl I don't fully understand the point of content warnings in so many cases where the warning is equally as potentially triggering as the content itself.

I get it if the content of the post is actually worse, but in a lot of cases it's like, people already mention the same exact thing they're giving a warning for... by saying it in the warning. Example:

"CW: SA

They were sexually assaulted"