"HEXBEAR IS THE 4CHAN OF THE LEFT!" [CW: mentions of suicide] (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

NSFW 126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"So, you mean they're homophobic?"

"Well, no, but-"

"So they're misogynistic? Racist? Transphobic? Ableist???"

"N-no, actually they enforce strict banning on all those things, BUT-"

"So they bully people into suicide?"

"Nooo, they require content warnings for even mentions of suicide, BUT!"

"...Yes?"

"I saw one of them say 'death to nazis!"

"So they're the opposite of 4Chan?"

"NO!"

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

hey dirt since this is a CW post can you nsfw tag it? thanks bae cat-trans

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sure thing rat-salute-2 Done.

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

rosa-salute

[-] Enver_McTim@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ngl I don't fully understand the point of content warnings in so many cases where the warning is equally as potentially triggering as the content itself.

I get it if the content of the post is actually worse, but in a lot of cases it's like, people already mention the same exact thing they're giving a warning for... by saying it in the warning. Example:

"CW: SA

They were sexually assaulted"