66
submitted 8 months ago by chat_mots@jlai.lu to c/voyagerapp@lemmy.world

Just discovered there is an Apple Watch app, I love it, ty :)

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pea666@feddit.nl 16 points 8 months ago
[-] Pechente@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago

I think this was done to get the PWA in the App Store because otherwise it wouldn’t add any value over just using the web version and therefore not be allowed in the store.

[-] aeharding@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

The native app has tons of extra functionality than the PWA due to access to native APIs. But yes the watch app was done to get into the App Store because the app “has to sufficiently differ from a web browsing experience.” (Which imo is dumb, tons of apps on the App Store don’t differ from a web browsing experience, they just show pictures in a feed…)

Anyways keyword “sufficiently”… Building the watch app was the only thing I could think of that would meet a conservative definition of “sufficient”.

God I hate the App Store.

https://lemmy.world/post/2923321

[-] Quicky@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And I thank you for it. I had to sit through multiple kids Christmas concerts this year, and having this on my watch was a lifesaver.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Wow!

If you played devil’s advocate to defend Apple’s stance, what are the best reasons you can come up with?

I’ve been annoyed by some terrible apps that seemed to be “just like our business’s website… but somehow worse!”, though not in some time.

Wonder if shady devs ever sell app-building services but simply deliver the client their own website in app form with zero benefits where a homescreen shortcut would’ve been equivalent. In that case the rule (which definitely seems at least to be misapplied) could cut down on spammy App Store submissions. Subsequently, saves Apple money on reviews!

[-] aeharding@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I mean as you said, if it’s literally just a website it doesn’t belong in the App Store.

But Voyager has always been optimized as an app. And this rule is definitely inconsistently applied according to other devs using Ionic :/ I think I just got unlucky.

In any case, it all worked out, and at least there’s a watch app now lol 🤷‍♂️

[-] Ilikecheese@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Any chance you could add the ability to browse the all feed from the watch app? I don’t really subscribe to many communities so the feed on my watch is rather bare. I prefer to browse all in the app, would be amazing to be able to do the same on my watch.

[-] aeharding@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Sure, just make a request on GitHub!

[-] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago

I hope we eventually get a version for Wear OS.

[-] Camilo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

Sorry for the ignorance, but what kind of uses does it have on a watch?

Is it for scrolling through your feed in the watch screen? Is it good?

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
66 points (91.2% liked)

Voyager

5575 readers
30 users here now

The official lemmy community for Voyager, an open source, mobile-first client for lemmy.

Download on App Store

Download on Play Store

Use as a Web App

Download on F-Droid

Rules

  1. Be nice.
  2. lemmy.world instance policy

Sponsor development! 👇

Number of sponsors badge

💙

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS