253
submitted 2 years ago by DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] archiotterpup@lemmy.world 79 points 2 years ago

If I can't burn your holy book without terrorism there's a problem.

load more comments (53 replies)
[-] not_me_now@sh.itjust.works 58 points 2 years ago

Imagine living in a world where you fear for your citizens because someone could kill them as a revenge for some burnt books.

[-] girlfreddy@mastodon.social 9 points 2 years ago

@not_me_now @DoctorTYVM

Some Americans feel the same way about those who burn a flag.

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

I have just noticed Americans calling for the killing of Democrats because they dare waving a LGBTQ flag. They are literally the same kind of people they hate, extremist Muslims

[-] girlfreddy@mastodon.social 9 points 2 years ago

@tired_n_bored

Yup.

Extreme fundamentalism from any angle is the same damned thing.

[-] not_me_now@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

The same can apply to them then.

I abhor any form of physical violence which I always find unjustifiable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

You don't even have to imagine. That's the sad part.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

How about stop letting certain groups have special treatment?

There is zero justification for going into some raging fit if someone burns a book. Yet all these left leaning European countries have tried to turn a blind eye or downplay every time one of these groups have assaulted or threatened someone.

Assimilate to a modern, 1st world culture, or go back to the stone age bullshit where you came from. You left whatever hellhole you came from because those countries are backwards-thinking conservative theocracies. Don't you dare come to these western countries and try to impose your backwards thinking onto the native folks already there. You Assimilate to their culture, they aren't going to walk on eggshells to appease your archaic religious nonsense. Fuck religion.

[-] baru@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Yet all these left leaning European countries have tried to turn a blind eye or downplay every time one of these groups have assaulted or threatened someone.

Which countries do you mean? And could you explain how they ignored people assaulting other people?

I fail to see why this is a thing, or why you mention it's somehow a "left" thing.

The reason it's more significant now is that Turkey is using the book burning as an excuse to withhold approving NATO membership. After that it became news, before that it wasn't news. Meaning, no need to make up stuff about you making up things about "left leaning".

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

There has been a massive influx of Muslims into Europe over the last decade or so due to troubles in the Middle East. The Left has naively been welcoming them en masse not realizing that so many of these people have zero interest in assimilating into these new countries and instead want to bring with them the extremist conservative values they had back home. This has been happening all across Europe from Germany to the UK to France to Sweden. These people have been known to try pushing their ass backwards views on locals and the locals not really being able to do anything about it.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Fuck Turkey they are the worst the NATO member and fight with the rest of them

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 34 points 2 years ago

Islamaphobia doesn't exist. A phobia is an irrational fear. It is perfectly rational to be afraid of people who's faith instructs them to kill the non-believers.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It IS islamophobia if you think all or most Muslims are like that. Do you think DJ Khaled or Dave Chappelle wants to kill you?

And that’s NOT what Islam says.

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

This isn't Islamophobia.

Islamophobia definitely exists, and is the phobia / hatred of all those who practice Islam, i.e. Muslims, via a generalization that all Muslims are extreme and dangerous. This is objectively false, and systemic Islamophobia needs to stop.

However, this here is cause for concern, as there are a few extreme fundamentalist Muslims calling for the death of people over a burned book. That's not Islamophobia, that's a fear response to a direct, physical threat.

Someone else in the thread mentioned some Americans calling for the death of anyone who burns the American flag. This is also extremely concerning.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ebenixo@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 years ago

Fuck religion. you can pray to your sky God however you want but you don't get to decide for others what they can or can't do on their time

[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

At some point we will just have to burn all the religious text and be done with it.

[-] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Burn every science book and eventually they'll be exactly rewritten. Burn every religious story and they're gone forever.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I wonder why they are so afraid of the religion of peace?

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, all major religions are known for their very level-headed followers. No need to worry.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Muslims allowing islam to be known as 'the religion of peace' is one of the biggest doublespeaky manipulations around. They're technically correct, because they're referring to this line from the quran: "There will be peace on earth when there is no more al-fitnah". Al-fitnah means 'disbelief' so what they're saying is, there WILL be peace on earth, once we've converted everyone to our religion (forcibly or otherwise).

I'm a bookworm, read voraciously, and as a sad lonely young teen who struggled to understand religious people, decided to read all the books. Hindu vedas; Christian old / new testament; Buddhist dhamapada; quran, and the hadith. Islam is an awful religion when taken literally, and the few islamic sects who are genuinely peaceful (eg ahmadi, sufi) are not even considered 'real muslims' by the more popular interpretations (eg sunni / shia / salafi).

Don't rely on out-of-context quotes from dodgy rightwingers, don't rely on out-of-context explanations from muslims seeking to proselytise and make excuses, EVERYONE should read it for themselves so you're debating on solid ground with facts on your side. My absolute favourite line from these particular religious texts is when Mohammed says he wants another wife to his (iirc final wife) Aisha. Aisha says something like, you've already had the maximum number of wives; Mo falls into a trance then says, don't worry, I just spoke to god and he says it's fine. She replies "Oh, how your god rushes to fulfil your desires". Even she knew it was a crock of shit.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] solstice@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Religious texts are just about the only books I support burning, especially if the intent is to piss off the morons that think the books are true.

How can I make a donation to buy more korans and kerosene for them?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
253 points (97.4% liked)

News

35714 readers
774 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS