69
submitted 1 month ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's nice to have my views on this validated. Maybe I'll do something about it now though... I know a few projects that could use the documentation touch-up.

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

What do they mean by 'Maintaining Sustainability'?

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I think a FOSS project remaining sustainable.

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Sustainability is a term with at least four columns: ecological, social, economical, political etc.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

I'm sure it's with time/money. If they have expenditures related to building/maintaining the software that are for example covered by donations, ensuring future donations would fall under "maintaining sustainability"

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I don't see why it couldn't mean all at once; overall sustainability of some thing could be seen as the sum of these individual aspects.

this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
69 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

27952 readers
366 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS