submitted 1 year ago by mac@programming.dev to c/software_gore@programming.dev

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] mac@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

Triggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ludicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you're fooling us, but I'm not having NONE of it.

[-] SnuggleSnail@ani.social 1 points 1 year ago

The reason is that we don’t need more. 1080p is what you can observe on a fullHD screen, so there is no need for more.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Google is getting better and better!!

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Well have you counted them?

I don't seem to have any particles around here I do have an awful lot of stuff but no particles.

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023

10 points (100.0% liked)

Software Gore

0 readers

1 users here now

A community for posting software malfunctions

Deliberately bad software or bad design is not software gore, it must be something unintentional

Icon base by Delapouite under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient and shear it

founded 1 year ago