RTO would make me go on medical leave for a couple years. Then on unemployment for a couple years. Then work for a bit. Repeat if necessary until retirement.

I've been applying to some jobs and the remote jobs are getting so many applications while the Hybrid/on-site in my area are not. Obviously the talent pool is larger for the remote jobs, and that means better candidates.

Kinda crazy that people are picking worse candidates they can see every day over better candidate further away.

The bosses just love watching the slaves bent over the oars, don't they?

This is the best summary I could come up with:

When the acute aspects of the pandemic receded, some who at first struggled began to settle into a work-from-home (WFH) groove and appreciated the newfound flexibility.

Many made the argument that the return-to-office (RTO) policies and mandates were better for their companies; workers are more productive at the office, and face-to-face interactions promote collaboration, many suggested.

Overall, the analysis, released as a pre-print, found that RTO mandates did not improve a firm's financial metrics, but they did decrease employee satisfaction.

Drilling down, the data indicated that RTO mandates were linked to firms with male CEOs who had greater power in the company.

Although CEOs often justified RTO mandates by arguing it will improve the company's performance, "Results of our determinant analyses are consistent with managers using RTO mandates to reassert control over employees and blame employees as a scapegoat for bad firm performance," the researchers concluded.

Specifically, after an RTO mandate, employees' ratings significantly declined on overall job satisfaction, work-life balance, senior management, and corporate culture.

The original article contains 587 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!