151
submitted 9 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 67 points 9 months ago

Oh no, not irreparable injury to a completely useless and environmentally damaging industry! Better keep causing irreparable damage to the planet instead then.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 63 points 9 months ago

Ie: "no you can't shut down crypto miners for pointless ecological destruction, I'm making great money off their wasteful power usage"

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 51 points 9 months ago

This isn't even an effort to shut them down; just report the harm they do.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 19 points 9 months ago

But that might lead to eventually maybe doing somethinginvestors!

Think of the investers!

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

Documenting the harm is one of the first steps to ending it...

"stop these atrocities!' "what atrocities? You've no evidence what's happening is bad."

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Trump judge?

checks

Trump judge.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 20 points 9 months ago

Won’t someone think of the scammers…

[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

My bored ape needs his slurp juice. HIS SLURP JUICE. PLEASE THINK OF MY BORED APE.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

When are we going to start telling these people their opinion is irrelevant, when we are going to war over water in the next decade? God, this is like watching a car accident in slow motion...

[-] krellor@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago

It really doesn't seem that hard to report electrical usage. The wording of the order (https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/releases/press550.php) isn't very specific, but it sounds like they would simply be surveying major commercial miners. All they should need to do is pull up their electrical usage. Of if they don't have it for some reason, they can estimate based on their devices and aggregate hash rate.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 12 points 9 months ago

The problem isn't doing it; it's that releasing the data makes them look bad

[-] krellor@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

Right; I just wonder what the judges imagined rationale is? It seems like it would be hard to construct even the veneer that it actually creates an unreasonably burden. But this is Texas, so🤷?

[-] TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Cuz the rationale is that he probably needed another vacation and a boat paid for.

[-] Dippy@beehaw.org 12 points 9 months ago

How could I possibly operate my business if I can't destroy the planet?

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 7 points 9 months ago

Have you tried massively underpaying your workers and hiding in tax shelters?

[-] Dippy@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago

I'm already doing that of course, and I'm only making record profits!

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 9 months ago

They don't even make them stop the destruction; just report how much damage they do

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

Of course it's fucking Texas.

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago

and because that judge is getting paid off by the crypto bros, he can't allow that to happen

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

Gosh, that's not suspicious...

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Now did that statement cyst a couple thousand or a couple million?

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
151 points (98.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5306 readers
776 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS