73
submitted 8 months ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/us_news@lemmygrad.ml
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Munrock@lemmygrad.ml 51 points 8 months ago

At the press of a button, all of those Chinese smart cars will transform to robot mode and form the AI-PLA! They'll then promptly repair and upgrade all of the USA's shithole-tier infrastructure, distribute educational tools and pamphlets across the US working class to give them class consciousness, and then promptly turn back into cars so that the US proletariat have the mobility needed to effectively organise.

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 17 points 8 months ago
[-] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 50 points 8 months ago

The security risk is US auto makers having competition.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 8 months ago
[-] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Chicken tax 2.0: the chuds will riot over tariffs so we should just go to war instead

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 8 months ago

muh free market

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 39 points 8 months ago

... Just ignore how GM, Ford, Tesla and others are spying on Americans... they are doing it for Uncle Sam so its fine

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 8 months ago

*spying on Americans but for subscription fee paid by the spyee.

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago

"your heated seat rental (and power steering) has lapsed, please swipe your card to restore functionality!"

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 8 months ago

So theyre confirming that American tech spies on us.

[-] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 8 months ago

It's not as if we didn't know this. PRISM has only grown in the 10 years since it was leaked.

Now we have credible allegations that macOS is designed to spy on you and Windows' spying is beyond obvious at this point

[-] Imnecomrade@lemmygrad.ml 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Ugh, I want an affordable tiny electric smart car. US is always a buzzkill.

[-] porcupine@lemmygrad.ml 39 points 8 months ago

You will have a coal-powered SUV that falls apart after 5 years and you will like it

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 8 months ago

It's either that or that low poly muskmobile began disintegrating even before it was put together

[-] Sickos@hexbear.net 17 points 8 months ago

Okay but like if I could actually have a coal powered SUV I would because steam engines are neat as hell. I want a Thomas the tank engine monster truck now.

[-] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago

They're called steam traction engines.

[-] Sickos@hexbear.net 11 points 8 months ago

Omg they are exactly as cool as I was hoping!

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 8 months ago

OG rolling coal

[-] PanArab@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 8 months ago

China is already the largest exporter of cars and they are pretty much banned from the US market except for US-branded cars like the Buick Envision. There's the whole rest of the world where China can undercut and possibly annihilate US and European makers.

[-] darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I love how they can just completely ignore the WTO and their own capitalist free and fair trade rules when they suit them by crying national security. As long as it has electronics in it no one even looks at it funny.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

US has been massively abusing TWO and has blocked judge nominations so cases against it can't go forward https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/explained/article/3042511/us-has-crippled-wtos-appeal-court-what-does-mean-asia

China also published an interesting report on the subject, in particular:

The US poses the biggest challenge to the global trading system. Following “America First” policy, the US has refused to shoulder its due obligations under multilateral trading agreements, and withdrawn from international treaties and organizations, taking a heavy toll on the development and functioning of the global trading system. A WTO dispute settlement report has identified the US as the biggest rule-breaker, responsible for two-thirds of violations of WTO rules. The US also blocked the appointment of new judges in the WTO Appellate Body, leading to an impasse in the Appellate Body since December 2019.

https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/wjbxw/202206/t20220619_10706059.html

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 8 months ago

I'm starting to think that BRICS wasn't even something these nations did willingly, but they were forced into it by the US just not giving them any other options if they didn't want their economies to be strangled.

[-] olgas_husband@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 8 months ago

risk of finding out the cars are smarter than then

[-] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 14 points 8 months ago

How about the national security risk of structuring your entire society around cars?

Glad we're safe there!

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago

Called it in another post about this.

[-] American_Communist22@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 8 months ago

protectionism for me but not for thee because i frame it as a 'national security risk'

[-] bleepingblorp@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 8 months ago

Cool, let's waste tax money on this ""investigation"". Better than spending it on bombs for Zionist terrorists to use against children I guess.

Also, completely unrelated side note: did you know US homelessness increased 12% in 2023? If that pace continues we'll double the homeless population between 5-6 years, and by about 2040 the percentage of USians who are homeless will be past 1% (so one out of every hundred people in the US). So glad we aren't spending money to investigate that, cuz fuck the poors amIright? /s

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 8 months ago

I'm conflicted on how I feel about this. On one hand, protectionist slows down the deindustrialization of America, which is bad. On the other hand, it hampers American competitiveness and innovation.

[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 8 months ago

On the other hand, it hampers American competitiveness and innovation.

Mildly disagree with this. Protectionism alone does not hamper innovation. For example, China's protectionism against American tech companies like Amazon and Facebook didn't do so because there was a complimentary policy in place to help develop alternatives. If America is never going to invest in electric cars properly, their automobile industry is not going to keep up, protected or not.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 8 months ago

True, but with protectionism, America's private industry loses even the slightest motivation to continue innovating. Also it increases the cost of things in America.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 8 months ago

Smdh China fitting it's EV's with coffee machines.

[-] miz@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 8 months ago

love too pay $40k for a half-decent car instead of paying BYD $11k

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 8 months ago

cranes, planes, and automobiles

this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
73 points (98.7% liked)

US News

2050 readers
34 users here now

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS