150
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Frub@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Telegram is just actually superior in terms of features I don't get it.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gnorv@feddit.de 111 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why do not more people choose a matrix server and use a decentralized way of communication instead of committing themselves to this or that app/company?

Because most people they know use WhatsApp/Facebook/Instagram.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 88 points 1 year ago

Why does anyone choose Telegram or WhatsApp over Signal which is encrypted and audited? (Probably features I don’t care about, but they do)

[-] akulium@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago

Telegram let's you send 2gb files, and stores them forever. Signal has a 100mb limit.

It also used to be easier to set up on multiple devices at the same time, but I believe that Whatsapp and Signal have improved that by now too.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure the file limitations are much of a factor when 100mb covers most files that would need to be sent through a messaging service. There are plenty of dedicated services for sharing larger files.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] silvercove@lemdro.id 8 points 1 year ago

Signal is based in the US. Better to use something that is not based in the.US.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] lemmyingly@lemm.ee 73 points 1 year ago

I don't understand the love for Telegram.

In the short period of using it I had so much BS come through by scammers/spammers - both as DMs and group messages. I've rarely had that with WhatsApp.

In my eyes WhatsApp is far better than Telegram. And Signal is far greater than WhatsApp. The only thing I wish Signal had was inbuilt GIFs; it's not that much of an issue on mobile but it's a pain on desktop.

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Telegram is awful with spam. I'm constantly getting sent links to Telegram groups for Russian porn models who all pretend to be underage and spamming their Boosty links. I feel like it's probably part of some scam to bait people into buying something illegal and then blackmail them later. I don't keep it installed anymore because I don't need that sort of incriminating shit on my devices.

I'd delete my account, but I have a couple people who only use Telegram, but I'm getting close to cutting them off over it unless they switch to something else. I've reported this to Telegram numerous times, but these accounts keep popping up and keep managing to reach me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] silvercove@lemdro.id 10 points 1 year ago

Telegram is more user friendly than Whatsapp, it's clients are open source and has a decent desktop app.

It's way better than Zuck's trash.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 61 points 1 year ago

People don't choose, people use whatever most people around them use. Whatsapp and telegram are both centralized, and shouldn't be trusted because, by the nature of it, they can (and eventually will) turn user-hostile.

Messengers come and go, if we really want to make some progress in this area, we should embrace federated and p2p protocols as the logical evolution. Anything else is just wasting time and user privacy.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] danhakimi@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Telegram gives me:

  • Roll-their-own encryption off-by-default without cross-device support or group chat available.
  • The ability to talk to strangers I don't want to talk to
  • An open source client, but a proprietary, non-federated server
  • An unmoderated social network that's a free-for-all for crypto scammers, extremists, and other nuts

WhatsApp gives me:

  • Signal's encryption algorithm on all chats
  • Whatsapp web (still with encryption)
  • Encrypted group chats
  • The ability to talk to human beings I actually know and want to talk to

Neither respects my privacy.

Not sure why I would bother attempting to use Telegram again.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

If most people used Telegram, Meta would have bought it instead of WhatsApp.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 1 year ago

a) because it's what everyone I know uses

b) telegram is not end-to-end encrypted by default. And not end-to-end encrypted at all for group chats. That's kind of a dealbreaker. Telegram is one of the last messaging apps I'd recommend.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 42 points 1 year ago

I didn't choose. Literally every single person with a smartphone in my country uses whatsapp so that's what I use too.

[-] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We don't choose which app we use. Our friends, family, and colleagues do.

I could live with Signal's functionality, but there barely anybody there.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Asudox@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why do people choose Telegram over Signal? Signal encrypts everything by default, unlike Telegram which only "encrypts" messages in a (iirc) secure or secret chat. Fortunately, EU is forcing all major gatekeepers' messaging apps to be able to communicate with other messaging apps. I, finally, will be able to break free from WhatsApp and use Signal. Uninstalling WhatsApp and requesting for a deletion of my account; a dream come true soon.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] cypher_greyhat@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Telegram is owned by Russians and the server is proprietary closed-source. I prefer Signal.

[-] Duxon@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Telegram's official components are open source, with the exception of the server which is closed-sourced and proprietary.

Telegram was launched in 2013 by the brothers Nikolai and Pavel Durov. Previously, the pair founded the Russian social network VK, which they left in 2014, saying it had been taken over by the government. Pavel Durov sold his remaining stake in VK and left Russia after resisting government pressure.

Telegram is registered as a company in the British Virgin Islands and as an LLC in Dubai. It does not disclose where it rents offices or which legal entities it uses to rent them, citing the need to "shelter the team from unnecessary influence" and protect users from governmental data requests. After Pavel Durov left Russia in 2014, he was said to be moving from country to country with a small group of computer programmers consisting of 15 core members. While a former employee of VK claimed that Telegram had employees in Saint Petersburg, Pavel Durov said that the Telegram team made Berlin, Germany, its headquarters in 2014, but failed to obtain German residence permits for everyone on the team and moved to other jurisdictions in early 2015. Since 2017, the company has been based in Dubai.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] leah@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

I use email with GnuPG. Everything else is woefully insecure. BTW, I have no friends.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dewritoninja@pawb.social 25 points 1 year ago

WhatsApp became the defacto messaging app in south America over a decade ago. Sms was really expensive so people opted for WhatsApp which was cheaper over data and you void send pics at a time where no carriers allowed mms. Now almost all carriers have unlimited WhatsApp as part of data plans. Switching to telegram is pretty much imposible

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 25 points 1 year ago

WhatsApp was there first and it was useful in countries where you paid for each individual SMS.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

The perceived usefulness of a network, platform, or communication protocol increases with its relative adoption. That's known as "network effect", and network effect is at strongest for anything regarding direct communication - such as messaging platforms.

In other words: WhatsApp is used by lots of people, and this discourages people to migrate over better alternatives, like Signal (my choice) or Telegram (OP's).

[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 18 points 1 year ago

Messaging apps are tricky, you can't just pick what's the "best" because it's primary function is to message people, so the best app is what can do that.

If nobody you want to message uses telegram, or signal, or matrix, than they aren't very good messaging apps FOR YOU.

You have to start using the app, then start convincing everyone else to use it, and that's quite a hurdle, when most people you know use the "good enough" Whatsapp, or even just SMS, or iMessage.

[-] theKalash@feddit.ch 18 points 1 year ago

It sends text to people. Even pictures or videos if needed. What more features would I need?

I don't know anyone that uses telegram. Whatsapp is just the standard, though many people have switched to Signal.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] radiated@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Telegram is worse than WhatsApp in terms of security. It doesn’t even use audited encryption by default.

[-] silvercove@lemdro.id 8 points 1 year ago

Whatsapp is a closed source app. You can't audit it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] unscholarly_source@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

I just roll with all 3 🤷

  • Signal for friends and family
  • Telegram for my own personal bots and hobby development projects
  • WhatsApp for the rest of the friends group that refuse to switch to signal
[-] IoSapsai@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Half of the people I regularly talk to are on WhatsApp. I don't like it but that's reality, it's hard to get them to migrate because this means that people THEY talk to would have to do the same. Also a good chunk of them use rakuten Viber. Now why do they use THAT? It's bloated, ad-ridden, and buggy. Almost nobody I know is on telegram. In fact most are still using Facebook messenger.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shashi154263@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because it what the people, I need to contact with, use.

[-] CrypticVader@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

As many have pointed out, it isn't really our choice, since we have to get along and use what most people around us use.
The only solution I see is if the government mandates every messenger to use a common protocol allowing all to co-operate.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

people use the messaging app that their friends are on
doesn't matter if it's objectively terrible

[-] akulium@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

Telegram has no end-to-end encryption for normal messages

[-] DeaDSouL@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Simply because everyone is using WhatsApp. And people want to use something that will let them be able to reach almost all their contacts.

Yet I do prefer & use Threema.

[-] peter@feddit.uk 12 points 1 year ago

Most people don't care that it's owned by Meta. They just want to be on the platform everyone else is on.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] zerbey@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know a handful of people on WhatsApp, a handful more on Signal, and a single person on Telegram who is a bit strange and thinks the world is a simulation (he's a hoot). So, basically I don't use Telegram at all because the only person I know on there isn't someone I'd want to communicate with anyway.

[-] gjghkk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

I use them all, but whatsapp prevails all, because Whatsapp was there first.

What's more important is that we know whatsapp is not the only device, and can be easily replaced.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Why would I use russian whatsapp owned by russian Zuckerberg living in Dubai?

If anything Signal would be the superior alternative.

But as stated by other ppl before me, I use whatsapp because at least where I live almost everyone uses it and Telegram is for conspiracy theories and Nazi or russian propaganda.

[-] silentdon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

People don't care what's superior, they care about if their friends are already on the app. And whatsapp built up that critical mass first, so it's the default.

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

Every person that i have ever talked to in my country use whatsapp and none use telegram

[-] Sentau@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

Riddle me this - Some people's argument against using telegram is that it is not as secure as WhatsApp(which on face value is true because WhatsApp is E2E encrypted while telegram is not E2E encrypted). Other people claim that only hackers and terrorists use telegram and that is why they don't use telegram. My question is why are people like hackers and terrorists using telegram in the first place if it has worse security while having no upsides for these kinds of individuals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

In my circles, it became popular during the pandemic and a number 1 source of misinformation, with an unnerving amount of obvious links to Russian propaganda- covid related, yes.

So after seeing the extreme antivaxxers join the telegram train, and seeing how gullible acquaintances got "tips" from their telegram groups, I just couldn't take the app seriously. I understand logically maybe the app itself is better than WhatsApp, I understand this may be just my personal experience and that there was just as much trash on WhatsApp. But having my sane contacts using WhatsApp already and my family on Signal, I never saw the need to switch.

[-] jcit878@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

while I have used telegram in the past, the association of it being used heavily by cookers and q idiots really just put a bad taste in my mouth

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
150 points (81.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43890 readers
872 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS