275
submitted 8 months ago by limerod@reddthat.com to c/android@lemdro.id
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] janNatan@lemmy.ml 126 points 8 months ago

Before you get excited, it's an IndieGoGo project.

[-] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 39 points 8 months ago

The one and only time I bought into a project on Indiegogo was for a phone that said it was shipping that month, even though the company had been delaying it for a year already (unbeknownst to me) and they had no idea when they were going to finish. It was straight up fraud, Indiegogo let the company do it without consequence, and 2.5 years later the project is still up on Indiegogo. Now I’m out $800, and the asshole company is still claiming they’ll send all the backers their phones any day now. They’ve been literally saying it for years.

Don’t learn the hard way like I had to. Never back an Indiegogo project.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

!RemindMe 1 year

[-] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 4 points 8 months ago

Isn't indiegogo just like Kickstarter? There's never a guarantee you'll ever get the thing you back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] casmael@lemm.ee 27 points 8 months ago

Aww shucks I was actually a bit interested

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago

Is there something in particular about Indiegogo that I missed, or are you just pointing out it's crowd funded? (and that means you could lose your money without anything in return)

[-] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 34 points 8 months ago

Probably the chances of them never delivering being more than 0

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Kickstarter is infamous for being full of marketing tech bros who take your money and deliver nothing.

Indegogo is Kickstarter without any of the consumer protections. It's not a matter of if you'll get scammed, but by how much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

So it goes well with my Cicret bracelet

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm not disinterested, though $350 is a little steep ($450 if you're not an 'early bird'). Ideally it would be bootloader unlockable and rootable as well. I would probably use it like a PDA of old.

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-minimal-phone-first-e-ink-qwerty-phone#/

Preliminary Specs:

  • CPU: MTK 6769
  • RAM: 4GB
  • Storage: 128GB
  • OS: Android 13
  • Display: 3.5” E-Ink Touch / 300 PPI / High Refresh Rate
  • Front Camera: 8MP
  • Rear Camera: 16MP
  • WIFI: 802.11 a / b / g / n 2.4GHz / 5GHz WiFi Direct,WiFi,B 4.1
  • AT&T: YES
  • T-Mobile: YES
  • Verizon: YES
  • Battery: 4000mAh QC 18W Wireless charge less than 20W
  • Features: QWERTY keyboard, NFC, GPS, A-GPS, Fingerprint (side), Face unlock, G sensor, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, Light sensor
[-] Kyoyeou@slrpnk.net 21 points 8 months ago

I looked into E-ink displays this summer and the tech is just so high priced

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 months ago

Wasn't e ink in the highest tier of patents stifling advancement?

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Yeah, licensing fees are super high. Who knows what kind of battery life and displays we might have on our personal devices today if eink wasn't so encumbered.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

It's fucking crazy cause my city just put e-ink displays on bus stops and I thought it was because they were going cheap, I guess not, though.

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Because e ink is basically perfect for bus stops. You don't need to update more than once a minute or two and it uses basically no power for running 24/7.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 8 months ago

They can't claim carrier compatibility yet before they even source the parts. (They're in Japan right now sourcing Chinese parts, allegedly, and only have renders thus far.) Let alone until they have a working prototype to test against fyi.

Carriers may very well not certify the device due to compatibility issues. Or they won't be able to afford the certification process.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 34 points 8 months ago

Man, what I really want is a e-ink smart watch....

[-] enix@reddthat.com 51 points 8 months ago
[-] histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago

I wonder how hard it would be to open source something similar with something like an nrf52 or similar and a 3d printed enclosure I might have to look into this tbh

[-] SeekPie@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Idk if Bangle.js is open source, but I imagine a e-ink display could be possible?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] vala@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

The Garmin Instinct watches have an e-ink like display. I get about 25 days of battery on mine.

https://www.garmin.com/en-US/p/775421

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I have a Fossil Hybrid, it's perfect

[-] Szybet@discuss.online 4 points 8 months ago

SQFMI Watchy exists... And has a chinese supplier now which doesn't suck

The community is also active, recently a few from ground up firmwares have appeared

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 4 points 8 months ago

I have an old Sony eink one which still works and is perfect

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] bubbalu@hexbear.net 22 points 8 months ago

This sounded like something I would be excited about but damn we got different ideas of 'low-price'.

[-] FlaminGoku@reddthat.com 5 points 8 months ago

This is almost twice as expensive as my moto power was that gives me several days of heavy use or a week of light use on a charge

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Yerbouti@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago

325$, how is that low-priced? I've never paid more then 200$ for a phone, I have an s20+ now.

[-] devilish666@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

For that price i can get second hand phone with higher specs & colorful screen

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Why do these phones always miss the mark?

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago
[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I'm just annoyed that they sell uncomplicated phones, but they are always hundreds of dollars. Just put an eink screen on a cheap SOC price around $40.

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 14 points 8 months ago

$40 is way too low. Economics of scale do not apply for such a niche product. $140-180 should be doable.

[-] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

The problem is that e-ink is a patented technology and the patent owner charges insanely high royalties for using it in your product.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 10 points 8 months ago

I'd get this if it has other messaging apps like Signal, and banking apps...seems like it has android so should be ok. Unfortunately I don't see it hitting the market realistically...

[-] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Man, I hope that takes off. Would be great to charge your phone every week or two.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

$350

Low price

I could go get a new Motorola from Walmart for $69 right now.

[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

The 69 dollar phone is a subsidized pre paid device. They plan on taking a loss on the sale and making it up with cell plans.

Also this is a niche device for a VERY niche audience. It will never be cheap cheap, just cheap for what it is.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

If it came with a good terminal app I would be very tempted. I loved my blackberry and the old slide androids.

[-] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 8 points 8 months ago

Is anyone using one of the Hisense e-ink phones? How are they?

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 12 points 8 months ago

My partner has an Onyx Boox Palma, which is similar in some ways. It's fast and would be usable as a basic smartphone if it could take a SIM card. Despite the display being one of the best it is ultimately still e-ink and has many downsides if you are trying to use it like you would a normal smartphone. The ideal target market for this kind of device is really people that have already cut down their screen time and can comfortably live without most things, but still want the option to install any application if necessary.

If you want a more conventional smartphone experience, the TCL NXTPAPER devices may be a better alternative, though they obviously have their own downsides as they do not have true e-ink displays.

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"Minimal"

At the software level, the Minimal Phone is based on a customized version of Android 13 and uses the MediaTek MT6769 SoC. It has 4 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal storage. The front camera has a resolution of 8 MP and the main camera 16 MP, of which the latter comes with flash. Bluetooth and WiFi for both the 2.4 and 5 GHz bands are supported. NFC, GPS and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor are also included, as are a compass and gyroscope.

A fingerprint sensor? 16 MP camera? This is just a regular phone with a worse display. The 2009 BlackBerry Tour had 128MB of RAM and a 3.2 MP camera, and it was high end. I realize there just isn't a market anymore for a device that doesn't have these features that could be priced under $400, but it really speaks to a lack of imagination in the industry.

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Also even if the prototype in the video is fully functional, they are not gonna have these delivered by August this year with a $500k goal lmao.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

How long does the battery last? I think a week minimum and preferably a month it's what would be needed to make it worth it.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 8 months ago

"several days"

So the same as most other modern phones under light use.

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 4 points 8 months ago

Not the same. E-ink displays only require power when you turn on the backlight or things change on the screen. The screen on time should be higher compared to regular LCD/OLED panels.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)

I have an e-ink notebook. The low refresh rate is intolerable for doing anything like menus or text input.

I like the idea of a minimal phone but I think e-ink is a deal breaker for me, and I suspect most others.

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 months ago

I wish I could get a tablet that is like the ReMarkable tablet with more storage (at least 64GB, storage is dirt cheap these days) or a MicroSD slot. I'm not paying $400 for a tablet with 8GB of storage in 2024. For comparison, you could buy 8TB of SSD storage for that price.

This is interesting but not quite what I want.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
275 points (95.1% liked)

Android

17668 readers
73 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS