72
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

Huntington Beach - Great location filled with the most awful people

[-] porksoda@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I knew before evening opening the article it was HB.

Huntington Beach, the high desert by the sea.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

I knew this would be Huntington Beach from the headline alone, and I've never even lived in socal. Sucks that that town is the way it is.

lol for real though I had the exact same kneejerk reaction. It’s a stereotype for a reason.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Look, I get the culture war shit going on here. I get the hate and get that LGBT rights are human rights. And I'll fight for that. (And, unlike most libs, that's not just a cute slogan for me. I mean it. When the trains start, my family first, but I'll do what little I can for the rest of you.)

But let me flip this around. Are y'all saying my group, whatever that may be, has a right to fly our flag on government property? Discuss.

My take: No flags on government property but Old Glory, state and city flags. Full stop. Not even the POW flag. Official government flags only.

[-] gastationsushi@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This beach town is slowly dying. Rising sea levels are already swallowing it's beaches during the highest tides and they will eventually demolish the city itself. And these myopic GOP voters would rather ban pride month flags than recognize the climate crisis they are leaving their grandchildren.

We don't need to pretend this flag ban is a serious issue by serious voters.

[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Well that's fucking stupid.

[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

have they banned Nazi and Confederate flags too?

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago

I know reading articles is tough, and I'm not a fan of HB, or this policy, but the very easy to find answer is yes.

By public referendum they voted to limit flags on public buildings to exclusively government and POW flags.

[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

cool, thanks

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The rainbow Pride flag and other nongovernmental banners will no longer fly on city property in Huntington Beach, California, an oceanside side community that has become a hotbed for broader culture wars.

“The Huntington Beach City Council is run by a hateful majority whose only interest is advancing an agenda of intolerance for minority communities, including LGBTQ+ individuals," said Peg Coley, the executive director of the LGBTQ Center Orange County.

Critics say Measure B is a thinly veiled attack on the LGBTQ community, but supporters say it removes divisive identity politics from the public square.

Huntington Beach has waded deep into culture wars in recent years, banning mask and vaccination mandates, condemning the Biden administration’s immigration policies, slamming Gov.

In 2022, voters rejected the previous City Council's politically diverse makeup and ushered in four conservative candidates who vote as a bloc.

Mayor Gracey Van Der Mark, who said she switched her party affiliation from Democratic to Republican in 2016, voted in favor of the flag ordinance.


The original article contains 806 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

How much of Huntington Beach is city property? Seems like a law only designed to signal the local governments values.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

Outlawing pride flags on private property would be laughably unconstitutional

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
72 points (92.9% liked)

politics

19233 readers
1495 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS