50
submitted 8 months ago by petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 38 points 8 months ago
[-] fl42v@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Are there like any use-cases for it other than "well, I can add another drive to extend partitions whenever I want"? 'Cuz that's how it's often described (if at all*), and it doesn't really make much sense to me. Like, if I install on a laptop, it'll most often have just one drive, so lvm seems unnecessary, and if I make some server-like setup with multiple drives, I'd go with some kind of raid with redundancy instead of just stitching the drives together (or mb yolo and raid 0).

* If I remember correctly, arch wiki for example, had it used in the partitioning guide for dm-crypt without explaining the benefits against just luksformating /

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

It still has use with a single drive. Being able to resize any partitions you create is useful. Snapshots as well. Particularly if you're using multiple file systems or file systems that don't support some kind of subvolumes. You can run it on a md RAID if you want as well.

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 6 points 8 months ago

LVM allows online resizing of volumes, and includes redundancy features such as snapshots and raid.

It's used a lot more in services than laptops.

[-] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 6 points 8 months ago

and if I make some server-like setup with multiple drives, I’d go with some kind of raid with redundancy instead of just stitching the drives together (or mb yolo and raid 0).

Server setups are usually virtual machines nowadays, with virtual disks (i.e. vmdk or qcow2 files in a storage pool). Stitching virtual disks together is valid in this case because redundancy is handled on another level, invisible to the vm.

[-] dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago

Just use Btrfs subvolumes.

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

Btrfs subvol isn't suited for all cases. For example I can't do LUKS on top of Btrfs because its a filesystem, not block storage.

[-] dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

You can't do LUKS on LVM either, right? Only LVM on LUKS, just like Btrfs on LUKS.

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You can. In fact I'm planning the setup for my laptop which uses this as part of the design.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dm-crypt/Encrypting_an_entire_system#LUKS_on_LVM

[-] dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

I've been using it for a while. It allows for easier redundancy without mucking about with the encrypted volume.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Sure you can.

[-] leanleft@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
50 points (94.6% liked)

Linux

48376 readers
861 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS