105

The US president was told in October that Israeli airstrikes were often carried out without “solid intelligence,” the newspaper claims

The White House knew since late October that Israel was regularly bombing civilian targets in Gaza, but President Joe Biden continued to publicly defend the Israeli military’s conduct, the Washington Post reported on Monday.

On October 27, three weeks into Israel’s war with Hamas, Biden’s top foreign policy officials told a small group at the White House that “Israel was regularly bombing buildings without solid intelligence that they were legitimate military targets,” the newspaper wrote, citing three sources familiar with the meeting.

The officials also expressed concern that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had no clear plan for defeating the Palestinian militant group, with one source telling the Post that “from the very beginning, there’s been a sense of us not knowing how the Israelis were going to do what they said they were going to do.”

At the time, the US was rushing military aid to Israel. Two weeks before the meeting, Biden visited the Jewish state and publicly declared that “as long as the United States stands…[Israel] will not be alone.” On the same day as the meeting, White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby told reporters that the US would not impose any “red lines” on how Israel conducted its military campaign.

The meeting did little to change the rhetoric of Biden or his officials. The president didn’t criticize Israel over the repeated bombing of a refugee camp in early November. Likewise, the White House publicly backed Israel’s decision to bomb Gaza’s largest hospital later that month, with Kirby telling reporters that Hamas had hidden a command center beneath the facility.

(Unarchived source: https://www.rt.com/news/594456-biden-israel-indiscriminate-bombing/ )

(Original source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/18/biden-israel-gaza-rafah-palestinians/ )

original source archive link

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Makan@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 8 months ago

This isn't news.

We know this.

(Okay, fine, it's news and proof too, in case we need it in an argument, but I expected this, tbh.)

[-] darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 8 months ago

It's nice to have western sources, of the trusted (CIA) variety saying these things if only because liberals can't bat them away like they can Palestinian sources or anti-imperialist sources.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 8 months ago

Oh, don't worry, they will. Still, it's funnier to watch them run in circles trying to figure out how the New York Post or whatever is actually Putin propaganda or something.

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 4 points 8 months ago

Some will, but this stuff still matters. There are some folks who really don't want to believe this is happening, and who are really dug in on "well do you want Trump instead?", but who aren't so not-listening that they'll ignore all evidence forever.

You peel back their excuses one by one and some of them will change their minds.

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Oh yeah, and mocking them for being just as dumb and ignorant as Trump supporters, and denying reality as much as them, once they've calmed down and are no longer furious you made that comparison, they might stop to think if that's really a position they actually want to be in, even if they don't consider it at the time.

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 23 points 8 months ago

Bold claim. I'm not sure Biden knows much of anything right now about anything honestly.

[-] chesmotorcycle@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 8 months ago

Biden doing his best impression of Reagan at this point: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=Gcd9_lj4BDs

[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 8 months ago

Until he gets court astrologers to make the nation's financial decisions for him, I'm not convinced.

[-] ImmortanStalin@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 8 months ago

They're called economists, sweaty!

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

The terrestrial astrologers I follow get things right way more often than libs… so…

[-] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 19 points 8 months ago

Wasnt wapo pro biden? This is not minor attack on his campaing.

[-] WayeeCool@hexbear.net 22 points 8 months ago

The Washington Post is whatever its owner Jeff Bezos wants it to be.

[-] D61@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago

Rotating villain?

[-] towerful@programming.dev -3 points 8 months ago

Can a news company not celebrate the good things and call out the bad things?
Tbh, i have no idea of WaPo's bias/reputation.

[-] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

Im not sure what you trying to say. They praise what their owners tell them to prayse, and they hate what they are ordered to hate. My point is that i thought wapo was pro biden, and this article looks like a shift in wapo position, wich is what im interested in understanding (if its in fact the case)

[-] Mzuark@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 8 months ago

The least shocking news I've ever heard.

[-] supersolid_snake@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Wow the racist segregationist that also fought to get the Iraq war was cool with killing more "darkies". What a surprise. He is not woke grandpa like all these libs want to believe. 99% of his life, his politics align with bush, trump, the klan, etc. the remainder is dementia.

this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
105 points (99.1% liked)

World News

2317 readers
110 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS