Moronic pro forced birthers didn't understand that putting a ridiculously low time limit to decide means women will need to make a decision faster instead of having time to think it over.
Nah.
That isn’t an oversight in their mind. The objective is to ban all forms of abortion. Legally, it’s a form of compromise, but in their view it’s a loophole.
The next crusade is that already limited window.
But they'll make this into an argument to ban abortion medication.
If only someone had warned politicians this would happen...
Oh wait, this was pointed out multiple times and they chose to ignore it.
I think like 80% of births would go away if people had the choice to become pregnant.
Hey girl, is this a good time to bake a baby? ( ) Yes (•) No
That is what contraceptions is for and countries where contraception and abortions are readily available don't have 80% lower birth rates than the US.
Lots of people don’t wear condoms. You’re missing the point. If your body had to “approve” the pregnancy, I think most people would not approve it unless they were actively trying.
80% of births would go away
I doubt it would be that high, but if it really did eliminate 80% of births, it'd be pretty catastrophic demographically. The US would have the lowest total fertility rate in the world by a significant amount.
As an American, I can live with that if it means people aren't forced to give birth when they don't want to.
Real "Oh no, anyways..." moment
Future generations will be able to make whatever demands they want for employment and employers would be forced to comply due to reduced available workforce. Yeah it'll fuck a lot of other stuff up but it won't be fucking over the working class.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.