An option to set a cache limit would be nice. Caching is okay, as long as you can clear the cache. Something like Mastodon caching. You can prune all remote media via tootctl
Turning completly off will increase the traffic of all other instances -> longer loading times 🤔
100% agreed. I don't have the time to make a change that complex right now, so I did a fairly blunt approach with the hope that larger instances will keep caching on to reduce load.
I think the local caching was intentional to reduce load on remote instances, should we disable it?
What I'd rather see is cleanup of cached data and more granular control of that cleanup, rather than completely disabling it.
Agreed, I sadly don't have the time to implement that.
Fair enough.
That's why I made it a config option that defaults to true (defaults to caching on).
I think big instances should cache, but for smaller instances with less funding and resources it makes sense to skip the caching.
This also helps mitigate the risk of people posting CSAM to attack other communities which your instance is subscribed to right? If you instance never cached the image, there's no clean-up you have to do on your end provided the original instance removes the image from their server.
As you've mentioned, it makes sense for larger instances to have a cache, but smaller instance (especially single-user instances) may actually be better off not caching at all and just hosting their own images. As a more long-term solution which can add to this patch, it would be good if Lemmy did 2 things:
Great work!
This got me thinking, does Lemmy clear orphan pictrs files? Say a user uploads an image but never submits the comment/post? That file is still on your pictrs and publicly linkable. And what if the post or comment is removed by moderator or deleted by the author? Is Lemmy cleaning these up?
I don't think anything in lemmy is currently clearing that. There are community scripts around that do some clearing but I have not tried them.
Interesting, I know personally one of my concerns with self-hosting an individual Lemmy instance (after losing my first account to the Vlemmy.net shutdown) was the threat of being held legally responsible for things cached on the server. Say someone uploads something illegal and my server caches it. Seeing it as an option to turn that off is nice, and for an instance only meant to be used by one person I'd imagine caching won't have a huge impact on load times
Designate your DMCA contact, pay your $6, set up a clear infringement policy, and rest easy. Full details in this EFF Fediverse Legal Primer.
Is there a general infringement policy that can be copy pasted so people don’t have to figure out the legalese to write out?
Nice! I would like to use it in stable version.
What's the use case for this? Reducing storage usage?
Yep! There's a pretty rapid growth of pictrs data that's never going to go away from all the images being cached for thumbnails on my instance.
It's starting to get to ~1GB per week at this point.
Holy shit, alright, I think I might be interested in this. I also have a growing storage problem that would need to solve. How does a patched instance look? Do you still see thumbnails? Can you share a screenshot?
go to https://campfyre.nickwebster.dev, sort by "new"
Thumbnails still seem to work.
Thanks for sharing! I see it takes a few ms to load the thumbnail but it's a worthy tradeoff if it saves that much in storage. I'll save this post and come back to your PR once it gets merged in, too lazy to apply it myself. :)
Exactly. Currently Lemmy copies thumbnail and images from remote instances locally.
I set this up on my instance about a week ago and it works perfectly, thank you!
Support / questions about Lemmy.