114
However this doesn't extend for candidates?
I think in their Trump ruling, they specifically said states can't bar people running for federal office. State offices are up to the state.
I disagree and think the supreme Court of the United States is wholly corrupt at this point, almost openly, but the rulings align technically
they specifically said states can't bar people running for federal office. State offices are up to the state.
Yep, which is absolute nonsense when you consider the fact that elections for federal office are the domain of the states, making them the ONLY ones who could possibly bar people from running without running afoul of the constitution.
To call those corrupt hacks "justices" is an enormous affront to the very concepts of justice and reason.
The Constitution does give power to Congress to pass laws on how states conduct voting (maybe just for federal elections? I'm not sure).
In this case, though, there isn't a congressional law on how the amendment should be enforced, so typically that falls back on the state you'd think. But no, instead the conservatives on the court made up their own law somehow.
Well there is the Voting Rights Act, of course this supreme court has been trying to dismantle it completely. Then again nobody's ever accused them of being consistent or honest.
This from a court controlled by the party that decries the federal government having too much power. Watch as the spiders eat their own and go on not caring.
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
114 points (100.0% liked)
News
23296 readers
1123 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS