23
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago
[-] taiphlosion@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

It's insane to me that the only country hit by a nuclear weapon would do this. Like absolutely insane.

[-] Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Apparently the International Atomic Energy Agency believes it to be safe, but the (demsoc) Communist Party of Japan are also opposed to the release

[-] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] iridaniotter@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

It's because the Fukushima meltdown released 8-45 PBq (quadrillion becquerels) of just cesium-137 into the ocean, and global nuclear testing has released a total of 400 PBq. The current radioactive release at Fukushima Daiichi is 22 TBq (trillion becquerels) of tritium per year, a thousandth as much as the meltdown itself. Some active power plants actually release more than this. The seawater being released is diluted to 1,500 Bq per liter compared to the WHO drinking water standards of 10,000 Bq/L or less and the Japanese release limit of 60,000 Bq/L. However, there was a leak recently that brought it up to that Japanese limit. If that was drinking water and you drank two liters of it every day, you'd be as irradiated as a flight attendant. That is to say, they should keep it lower. However, don't expect three-eyed fish from the radiation - that stuff is more likely from toxic chemicals.

[-] Kirbywithwhip1987@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago
[-] iridaniotter@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Cool, it's safe. China does the same thing

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
23 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2315 readers
286 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS