189
submitted 6 months ago by fubarx@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

To Republicans, that just means he's smart!

[-] HogsTooth@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

How unamerican

[-] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago

Funny that this info only comes out immediately after Schiff successfully crushed people that would actually represent us in the primaries.

I'm so sick of corporate dem malfeasance. Absolute demons.

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

You're asking candidates to compete for a job. Why are you surprised when they take actions consistent with their best interests. I don't think Schiff did anything inappropriate. Schiff mentioned Garvey to raise his profile because he's easier to defeat.

This isn't like Nixon contacting South Vietnam while he was a presidential candidate and telling them to not make peace because he wanted the war as an issue. That directly led to the deaths of thousands of Americans.

Assuming you preferred Katie Porter, what did you do to ensure she'd be the candidate?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

Why are you surprised when they take actions consistent with their best interests.

Because they're running for a job where they should have the public interests first.

Just because America is a shitty corporate hellhole doesn't mean we can't be disappointed when politicians fail to live up to a reasonable standard.

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Because they're running for a job where they should have the public interests first.

Yes, in the job they should have the public interest first. But he's competing to get the job, he can't work in the public interest unless he's elected.

Just because America is a shitty corporate hellhole doesn't mean we can't be disappointed when politicians fail to live up to a reasonable standard.

I'm not sure what your standard even is? How can a candidate act in the public interest? They put forward their platform and the people decide. That's what happened. Should he not run because you don't think his policies are best for the public? Isn't that what voting is for?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Shouldn't even really call it a job, it's not, it's public service. To serve the betterment of the people.

[-] comador@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Should have stuck to being a baseball icon and announcer, he's not good for anything else.

[-] frickineh@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Add it to the list of reasons he sucks.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Someone needs to be at every one of his campaign events shouting, "Pay your back-taxes! Why haven't you payed your taxes?" at full volume.

Edit: When someone like this is on stage supporting your campaign, you know you're evil as fuck.

Edit2: I landed on his site trying to find out if he'd have any events that I can drive to and take my own advice. I found no info. I live in the Bay Area. If you find out he's doing an event that I could drive to in an hour or less, please let me know.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 6 months ago

Why can't he pay? Too much avocado toast?

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
189 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19050 readers
4609 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS