64

Both introduce the world to youngsters, but with different modes.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mechanismatic@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure I understand the "yesterday's" part. Thomas the Tank Engine predates Cars by decades.

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 25 points 1 year ago

But Thomas the Tank engine was introduced like 50 years before Lighting Mc Queen.

[-] DrQuint@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

And neither Cars nor Cars 2 spend a lot of time on edutainment surrounding their setting. The only thing the two have in common is they're vehicles.

Oh no, yeah, you guessed it, I didn't watch beyond 2. I mean, neither sid anyone else after that torture.

[-] petenu@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

After Cars 2 I had very low expectations of Cars 3, unsurprisingly. It's a miracle that I was convinced to watch it. Yet somehow I was, and found it to be bloody good.

[-] hotwarioinyourarea@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

And it's been consistently popular the entire time.

[-] ewe@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] wrath-sedan@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Kachow 👍

[-] pizza-bagel@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Cars 1 and 3 are really good movies and you should watch them if you have not. Cars 3 is my favorite.

And I don't even like cars

[-] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Bro why is cars 2 so hated? I don't remember it to be that bad

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 11 points 1 year ago

The story in Cars 2 is all over the place and the car universe only makes the whole thing more abstract.

The story includes car races, terrorism, environmental issues, cold war agents, international stereotypes, hacking, secret world orders formed by victims of production malfunctions, the rejection of old friends and a whole lot of meaningless action and comedy skits.

And then someone decided to add the queen of England to sum this up as if she even had anything to do with the rest of the story.

It's brainstorm of references run wild. Even if you manage to follow along and get all the references, you gotta wonder why anyone wanted you to see this.

[-] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

And what's bad about all you said? Crazy movies can be quite nice

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 1 year ago

It's just pointless is all.

Cars 1 had something to say about urbanisation.

Cars 3 had something to say about getting old and dying.

Cars 2 had some 3d models doing slapstick comedy action while clinging to references to everything imaginable, but nothing to say.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not awful, but it's still definitely the black sheep. It's tone is completely different and it also just feels like it's just the same characters (but kinda flanderisations of them too) rather than a natural progression of where the story should go next. The throughline between 1 and 3 is much more consistent, even more so if you skip 2.

2 isn't a bad film, but it's not a good sequel in my opinion, 3 however is a great sequel and a good ending point.

[-] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I know it goes from "haha funny race" to "there's this terrorist here that's killing cars across the world" but guess what? I love that mission impossible shit

[-] pizza-bagel@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I actually agree with you that the hate is overblown. But in comparison to 1 and 3 it's definitely not as good. I wouldn't even say it's a bad movie, it's just kinda meh

[-] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I really don't remember 3 to be that good either. Like, it was basically predictable and probably heavily relied on its name to sell

[-] pizza-bagel@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Ok now we are gonna have to fight irl

Send me your address

[-] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The Gates of Hell

[-] severien@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I didn't know it's actually called Thomas the Tank Engine. I thought it's a joke, since a train isn't what I imagine these days when hearing it...

[-] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

A "tank engine" is a steam engine - an old fashioned train.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

It's a specific type of steam engine made to not require a tender.

[-] Donebrach@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think you actually meant that Thomas The Tank Engine is Tomorrow’s Days of Future Past Biggie Smalls https://youtu.be/ETfiUYij5UE

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/ETfiUYij5UE

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
64 points (77.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

29525 readers
719 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS