Surely a man committing hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of securities fraud felony would get more jail time than someone stealing food to feed himself, right?
... right?
Surely a man committing hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of securities fraud felony would get more jail time than someone stealing food to feed himself, right?
... right?
Is the person stealing food rich? If so, then no one is going to jail.
:(
Corrupt piece of shit evades justice again.
Alright. So... The officials involved in that decision need to be investigated...
White collar crime... won't get better until consequences actually matter
Here’s what the prosecutor had to say:
Wice said he had been “besieged by a torrent of phone calls” from people who have “expressed their monumental displeasure with the fact that these cases are being resolved with a pretrial intervention.” Touting the restitution Paxton now owes to his alleged victims, Wice said it was more important to secure justice for them than to pursue prison time for Paxton, which he said should only be a priority if the defendant poses a threat to public safety.
“I appreciate your concern,” Wice said of those criticizing the outcome. “With all due respect, your truth is not the truth. You know one half of 1 percent of what [fellow prosecutor] Mr. [Jed] Silverman and I know about the facts of these cases. And the fact that all of these people have registered their monumental displeasure with what happened in these cases, I submit, probably should have been directed at the ballot box.”
I’m not sure I understand his angle here. Is 271k of restitution more important than holding Texas’ top law enforcement official responsible for crimes he’s charged with?
Prosecutor said it's not their responsibility to ensure he faces consequences for crimes committed.
Wice said it was more important to ~~secure justice for them~~ protect his relationship with his corrupt boss than to pursue prison time for Paxton
Fixed it for him
I didn’t go down the road of finding his political donations, but I think that would be a very interesting data point.
Oh, excellent! A slap on the wrist is sure to make him change his ways, and turn him into a cautionary tale for others!
"Ooops the law accidentally applied to a republican, let me fix that real quick"
Seriously why do we still follow laws? I say break every one you can get away with at this point.
Seriously why do we still follow laws? I say break every one you can get away with at this point.
That's part of the problem, though: regular people don't get away with shit, even when they're not guilty.
Federal prosecutors have an average conviction rate of over 90% even with the rich and powerful getting away with everything. There's no way that over 90% of everyone federally prosecuted are guilty.
The poor, which are the vast majority of defendants, can't afford an attorney and public defenders offices are ridiculously understaffed and underfunded to the point that they sometimes have only a few minutes TOTAL to get in, tell someone innocent to take a deal that will ruin their life and go on to the next victim of what is grotesquely referred to as the "justice" system by some.
Having a person like that as attorney general is just a travesty beyond belief.
Absolute bullshit.
This is BS. These types of agreements destroy accountability.
Prosecutors agree to give their boss a free pass on felonies
The best community service he could do is stepping down.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
HOUSTON — Prosecutors on Tuesday agreed to drop the securities fraud charges facing Attorney General Ken Paxton if he performs 100 hours of community service and fulfills other conditions of a pretrial agreement, bringing an abrupt end to the nearly nine-year-old felony case that has loomed over the embattled Republican since his early days in office.
The deal is the second major win for Paxton in roughly the last six months, after the Republican-controlled Texas Senate acquitted him last fall of 16 impeachment charges centered on allegations that he accepted bribes and abused the authority of his office to help a wealthy friend and campaign donor.
Two of the charges — first-degree felonies — stemmed from allegations that Paxton persuaded investors, including a then-GOP state lawmaker, to buy at least $100,000 worth of stock in a tech startup, Servergy, without disclosing that he would be compensated for it.
Paxton will have 18 months, the length of the pretrial deal period, to pay restitution to the former lawmaker, Byron Cook, and the estate of Joel Hochberg, a Florida businessman who died last year.
The outcome marks the latest example of Paxton emerging from scandal virtually unscathed, a trend that has baffled and enraged his critics and reinforced his status as a hero of the party's most conservative flank in Texas and beyond.
Paxton, who spent a largely uneventful decade in the state House, rose to political prominence based in part on his reputation as a stalwart backer of religious liberty who would use the attorney general's office to wage major legal battles on issues like abortion and LGBTQ rights.
The original article contains 1,421 words, the summary contains 268 words. Saved 81%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
I hope they make him coach an inner-city under-funded little league hockey team.
I bet serving in an elected office will count.
Probably. Anything else would be an actual consequence for that selfish narcissist, having to actually provide a service to his community.
But it's more fun to imagine him wearing a neon vest in the middle of a South Texas summer picking up garbage next to an interstate.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News