250
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 75 points 6 months ago

Yeah, we know. We're very well aware.

Honestly this is the first article I've seen from a major outlet actually saying it outright instead of pretending the people and workers are the problem. Now what the fuck are we going to do about it?

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

Elect more neolib oligarchs.

It didn't work the other hundred times, but this one's different!

[-] Sneptaur@pawb.social 19 points 6 months ago

Elections won’t fix this and we all know it

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago

Real change in America has never come from elections. It starts with direct action, and the direct action continues until it's so much of a problem the government is forced to do something.

[-] Sneptaur@pawb.social 5 points 6 months ago

Correct. Of course we should STILL vote, because voting can create favorable conditions for more effective direct action, but it's no the solution in and of itself

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

Voting is how we keep things from getting worse, just not how we make things better

[-] Sneptaur@pawb.social 3 points 6 months ago

Yes exactly

[-] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

But elections do determine the ratio of beatings to helpful legislation that occurs when government is forced to do something.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Time to switch it up and go full corrupt billionaire fascist

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

I wanna vote for the corporation directly! President Walmart and VP Tesla

[-] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

Well that's the problem, as an individual you can't. Just like saving the planet.

You can do your "bit" but you'll have no real effect

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago

Stock buybacks should have stayed illegal. It’s naked market manipulation done as a flex with whatever fresh layoffs cash you have on-hand.

The stock market is literally gambling, and these behemoth corporations are allowed to affect the outcome. It’s blatantly cheating, but TPTB made it not just legal, but commonplace.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Stock buybacks should have stayed illegal. It’s naked market manipulation done as a flex with whatever fresh layoffs cash you have on-hand.

Oh come on. Sometimes its bailout cash.

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm okay with buybacks because it's the only way for a corporation to go private if they want to, and honestly I think the stock market would probably be a lot healthier if the idea was for corporations to eventually buy back stocks after going public instead of them getting traded like commodities. I mean, my understanding is that's kinda how private investing works. You give someone money in exchange for ownership of a percentage of the company, a share of the profits, or whatever, and eventually the company will pay you back.

However, stocks that are bought back should be frozen for a certain period of or something; to keep corporations from using them to game the system.

Edit: I also think things like CEO bonuses and stocks should be capped to a percentage of their workers' bonuses. If workers receive a $1,000 bonus, the CEO shouldn't be getting $10 million. If the CEO wants to give themselves a $10m bonus, then that's fine, they should just be prepared to shell out 6~7 figure bonuses to their workers.

[-] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago

I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you! Well...

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

This is why, they keep saying trickle down is a myth because when it finally happens it's gonna be way more than a trickle... Right?

Like... Right?

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

Probably more likely to feel a fire hose than anything from trickle down.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

“Would you like to play ‘Capitalism’?”

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

The neat thing about Capitalism is that when you're born, you're already playing it!

...and you already have a status condition, "poor."

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

In the UK they've tried to label this as the cost of living crisis, as if the change in value due to inflation it put to some kind of inflation control account in the sky.

Its always been the corporate greed crisis. You'll even get corporate bootlickers trying some kind of "its not like they just became greedy." Which is true. However, they've never had such a good excuse to whack up their prices, to see what sticks, and have the very same people they're ripping off stick up for them rather than use their brains before.

Stock bros with just enough knowledge to be dangerous types.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


What’s happening: The 200 largest publicly traded companies in the United States saw their combined net profits soar to $1.25 trillion in 2022, a gain of 63% from 2018.

These are just unbelievable numbers that indicate we are in a new Gilded Age,” said Irit Tamir, senior director of Oxfam America’s private sector department.

Oxfam’s report — collected by analyzing companies’ 10-Ks, proxy statements and other public data — found that the retail sector, which is the most demographically diverse in the country, was also the least equal.

“No billionaire should pay a lower tax rate than a teacher, a sanitation worker, a nurse,” he said in his State of the Union address on March 7.

However, there are lock-up restrictions that would likely prevent Trump from selling or even borrowing against the value of that stock for months, reports my colleague Matt Egan.

Devin Nunes, the CEO of the combined company, said in a statement that the business will move to “reclaim the Internet from Big Tech censors.”


The original article contains 1,120 words, the summary contains 168 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
250 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19100 readers
5273 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS